It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sled735
In my previous post:
The most puzzling however is not so much how Piri Reis managed to draw such an accurate map of the Antarctic region 300 years before it was discovered, but that the map shows the coastline under the ice. Geological evidence confirms that the latest date Queen Maud Land could have been charted in an ice-free state is 4000 BC.
It seems to back up the theory that people with incredible knowledge (the Atlantis civilization?) could have done this with the help of an advanced civilization.
Then please explain to me how this was done when the latest it could have been charted in an ice-free state was 4000 BC ?
originally posted by: AlexDJ
The real truth about WW2 is more unvelibable almost a sci-fi movie that people would say it cant be truth if they knew, the rise of Germany after the WW1 is almost hard to believe, from the ashes and destruction and death Germany in a very few years they were already up running and with mind of vengance over WW1, for the thirst of blood. Germany didnt rise after WW1 by itself, it got help from some ET factions that wants some control over Earth , that believe of arian destiny and the occult came from this ET faction, they provide to Germany with new science and technology ( V2's rockets, radars and submarines and even some planes with almost untreaceble radar capabilitites that to this date are confidential and top secret, even the history channel made a documentary of this kind of plane), The Battle of LA was the beginning of this, it was the the event that announce the hostilitys.
originally posted by: amsterdamn87
It seems there are a lot of skeptics here. Now I'm not saying anyone is right or wrong, but it seems alot of threads ive been to lately, seem to go off topic, or for whatever reason is "proven" to be wrong. Ive realised its alot easier to be a skeptic than to have an open mind. I am surprised to see so much hostility towards a story, that would otherwise be seen and thought about years ago. I'm no expert, nor do I have any credibility. But really, the available info about this incident, doesn't in the least bit, seem suspicious?
originally posted by: CirqueDeTruth
Well I came late to the party and after reaching the end of the thread - phew... girl. You got some haters, don't you?
After all, I like to consider, hypothesize, and what if my way - around such stories as Sled so wonderfully crafts for us.
But I did notice, many here Sled are of the jealous type. Very molded in their way of thinking, and fighting hellishly to get other people to also fall into their way of thinking. It helps them validate themselves, and their methods. It's a coping mechanism they play to justify their means. I'd really start just, thanking them for their contribution to your thread and pay them no mind.
Focus on those posts who are interested in the same "what if" questions you are. After all, simply by their manner you know they think they are on a crusade to enlighten the "dummies" right? In their mind, that's what justifies it for them. They think they are saving people from their foolishly stupid ideas!
I've always been interested in the rumors of occultism in Nazi Germany. I also look at the "Projects" that erupted in the US after the acquiring some of the Scientists from Nazi Germany in Project Paperclip. Here are a few sites I've come across in researching for myself the ideas presented in your OP Sled, (cause lets face it, we aren't looking at skeptics willing to "what-if" the content for even a moment - that would be "*gasp* sacrilegious to the status quo of what our approved history teaches us.)
Yeah pretend this is a finger and ....
Well, those are a few interesting sites I came across regarding the "myth" surrounding these topics, as I find that it's fascinating stuff, regardless of what pans out to be forbidden history; and just mythology. Either way, it says a lot about us - humanity.
Piri Reis wrote some notes on his map which detailed his sources. He admits that he was not the original cartographer of the works depicted in his map; he states that he merely compiled a number of source maps into one piece. He claimed to have used the source maps of Columbus among other earlier explorers, but some sources he claimed, went back to 400B.C.E. and even earlier. These source maps were most likely derived from the Imperial Library in Constantinople since this was Reis’ main source of information and where his map was originally discovered. Where did these source maps come from? Who could have mapped the topography of Antarctica prior to the glaciation before our modern era?
originally posted by: CallmeRaskolnikov
originally posted by: uncommitted
I'm going to have to ask... why? It was mentioned in an allegorical tale by Plato, had absolutely NO other references against it at the time. It then became a bit of a fad later on in the 19th century and then new agers decided to embellish it as a place way ahead of its time with all manner of wonders being performed - for which of course there is absolutely - utterly - completely - no shred of evidence prior to said new agers dreaming it up and scamming the gullible.
Now, was there an allegorical nation that stood up to Athens but was ultimately defeated? Doesn't sound too far fetched. Did their island become submerged? Who knows! There is nothing to say that what Plato wrote wasn't without a basis - but as soon as you add in the new age nonsense it immediately becomes without any substance whatsoever.
No "evidence"? I guess you've never heard of Edgar Casey? Aside from his work there is a research organization now dedicated to discovering the ruins of Atlantis. They have some interesting research.
Edgar Cayce’s A.R.E: The Search For Atlantis
Moving along... when the U.S. found out about this, they sent their ships to investigate the area too. When they got close, a large disc-shaped craft came up from the water and passed by them so fast it bent one of the antennas on the ship, and was gone in the blink of an eye.
It sent down a ray and blew up the ship after that, so the fleet turned around.
originally posted by: sled735
Okay, I made a mistake in the OP. Just to bring this to your attention, it wasn't a ship that was blown up, it was two planes. You can watch it at the 11:16 mark.