It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Certainly one should be able to believe what they want. I just worry about pressure to ban "hate speech" or speech they don't like. One aspect of living in a free society it that one must tolerate some people whom one does not like.
As for the "greater good," what is considered "the greater good" can vary from person to person to person--which is why one must be wary about suggestions to restrict someone's civil liberties "for the greater good." I think one can look into history and see a great number of truly awful things done to people in the name of "the greater good."
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: NavyDoc
Certainly one should be able to believe what they want. I just worry about pressure to ban "hate speech" or speech they don't like. One aspect of living in a free society it that one must tolerate some people whom one does not like.
I agree - completely. Freedom is complicated. Also - scary. I've always believed that any group of people that calls itself free will work things out naturally - as in - just like in nature. Balance is about weight/counterweight, action - reaction...
Too many rabbits? Next year you get more owls
I think we all (mostly) agree about right and wrong in the big picture - but we're a little fuzzy closer in. So, I see humanity moving two steps forward and one step back through the years and decades and centuries towards something we all ultimately want, but can't quite put into words that will work for all of us at the same time
But in the moment, the process is invisible and all we see is resistance, animosity and a fight for control
Those in control want to decide what's right and wrong for everyone - to the victor goes the spoils - and all that :-)
Tolerance is an interesting idea - don't you think?
As for the "greater good," what is considered "the greater good" can vary from person to person to person--which is why one must be wary about suggestions to restrict someone's civil liberties "for the greater good." I think one can look into history and see a great number of truly awful things done to people in the name of "the greater good."
Yes - exactly. It's not possible - nobody will ever agree about the greater good. It's possible to see how far we've come with time - none of it without a lot of fighting and suffering and loss. But, still...
I prefer the attempt at a greater good rather than settling for the lesser (and more specific) good. It's all just words and opinion I suppose - but a lot of important changes have come from words and opinions
History will show us where we made our mistakes - and where we created something beautiful
Thank you Navy - for a real conversation :-)
originally posted by: 0zzymand0s
a reply to: Annee
The only thing Atheists have in common is a lack of acceptance of theism. God? If it exists and whatever it is -- it never had anything to do with religion.
I will ask you once more read my first answer on this thread or are you ignorant
Well it took you quite a while to reply young lady,
I would ask you to name three things people are willing to die for,
Now have I as a person ever harmed anyone in my Life, No except in self defence following orders which is not the same thing.
So if you attitude is based on a belief there is nothing then I assure you that you are in for a rude awakening but if it is simply because you do not believe in my religion then obviously I have my faith and you have whatever religion you have.