posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 03:06 PM
a reply to: chemtrailcarrey
Hmm, interesting site. Firstly, to establish ones credibility, is it really a good idea to start with an ad hom combined with an unprovable claim
about what sceptics "will tell you"?
The uneducated will tell you that chemtrails are a conspiracy theory. That chemtrails are made up by paranoid conservatives. That the government
doesn’t hide things from the public. That chemtrails are fake. They will tell you that chemtrails are contrails. I’m hear to tell you the
FYI, unprovable claim is that sceptics claim the Government doesn't hide things......unless you can find ONE example of this, your source is already
junked, by itself.
When you are trying to promote truth, it's a really bad idea to start with an obvious lie designed to discredit your opposition because you can't
argue with the facts.
Interesting that the picture showing contrails is EXACTLY what 99% of chemtrail believers say are chemtrails.
In the chemtrail picture, why is that a chemtrail? Why can't it be so ething more mundane?
I think you"ll find that Defcon5, and most of us, have done considerably more research, and are considerably more "educated" on this subject, than
edit on 19-6-2014 by waynos because: (no reason given)