Who do you think the Star Child skull was?

page: 3
7
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 12:03 AM
link   
Probably a deformed ET or early genetic splicing gone wrong.




posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 01:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: blkcwbyhat
a reply to: DupontDeux
Same as the crystal skulls,proven fakes.
This is news to me, I don't suppose you have any links to prove the Crystal Skulls are fakes? I know this is off topic so a pm i preferred, they really interest me.

It seems to me that if the Starchild Skull was genuine (I am undecided) and TBTP wanted to rubbish it and make it seem fake, then it would be easy to do online...



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 03:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: blkcwbyhat
a reply to: DupontDeux
Same as the crystal skulls,proven fakes.
This is news to me, I don't suppose you have any links to prove the Crystal Skulls are fakes? I know this is off topic so a pm i preferred, they really interest me.

It seems to me that if the Starchild Skull was genuine (I am undecided) and TBTP wanted to rubbish it and make it seem fake, then it would be easy to do online...


Here ...

The team also noticed a small deposit of something curious in the Smithsonian’s skull. By using X-ray diffraction they discovered the deposit was silicon carbide, a synthetic abrasive used in stone-carving workshops only starting in the mid-20th century.


cen.acs.org...



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 01:23 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The majority of your ramblings here are opinions that you take to be facts. It does make you obtuse. It is clear that you go against much with a closed mind while pretending to look at all angles. There is a bigger picture here you are missing. Your back and forth bickering and belittling is childish and benefits no one in the long run.



posted on Jun, 21 2014 @ 01:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The majority of your ramblings here are opinions that you take to be facts. It does make you obtuse. It is clear that you go against much with a closed mind while pretending to look at all angles. There is a bigger picture here you are missing. Your back and forth bickering and belittling is childish and benefits no one in the long run.


How are they opinions when I source them as facts? Just because you do not like the answers does not make them any less true. If you wish to be a mumpsimus and remain ignorant be my guest.

In 1999 BOLD testing lab was able to recover both an X and a Y chromosome, proving that the mother and father were both human.


DNA testing by Trace Genetics in 2003 found the "Starchild's" DNA is from haplogroup C. The woman found with him had DNA from haplogroup A. That means they are NOT related.

Sorry the facts don't suit your delusions.



posted on Jun, 21 2014 @ 02:27 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Howdy OccamsR4

Hey good use of Mumpsimus!

My view of the thread's subject.....

Diseased child who was made into a money making machine by a non-scientific clown....or is that too harsh?



posted on Jun, 21 2014 @ 03:17 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04 I never stated they were related. My delusions are just as valid as yours. If you do not want to take into account new testing then that does not mean it is not valid.



posted on Jun, 22 2014 @ 12:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: Hanslune
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Howdy OccamsR4

Hey good use of Mumpsimus!

My view of the thread's subject.....

Diseased child who was made into a money making machine by a non-scientific clown....or is that too harsh?

Thanks. My vocabulary decreased in college because no one understood me so I had to simplify it. Then I moved to SC and the past 5 years it's been the same thing. So my vocabulary is not what it used to be and I need to stop catering to everyone else and get it back to where it should be.

As to the rest .. you are dead on. We have two respected genetics labs who tested the skull and both found only human DNA. Melba Ketchum is the only one who has discovered alien DNA ... but then again Ketchum found bigfoot too, until the evidence was found to be wrong.



posted on Jun, 22 2014 @ 01:07 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

...one must also ask how a machine built with software to detect human DNA would detect "alien" DNA, lol, I often wonder if these people think this stuff through.....at best you'd get an error message.

On the other subject - yeah I spent years removing 'Hawaiianism' from my speech because no one of course understood them in Europe and the mainland (continental USA)





new topics
top topics
 
7
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join