a reply to: sled735
I understand , and in that case I would say that criminals need two things opportinity and motive, anonymity is not certain even in a massive City
where you might think you could blend in because of the numbers,well this isnt how it works,humans base their lives on patterns and on familiarity and
we are very capable of integrating large volumes of incoming data about or surroundings static or changing,we recognise and memorise patterns.
The only people in National Parks with patterns of this type are wardens and bears.
There are a lot of people who frequent these areas and they are as RANDOM as can possibly be achieved, any serious long term serial criminal will see
this as a PRIME opportunity to commit any crime which requires a high degree of anonymity,and we know ALL crimes require this.
If you tried coercing or dragging a kid two full city blocks in his neighborhood you would get a huge surprise,because many many people know each
other and watch out for each other.But in any National Park on any busy day you could do this and not even be noticed especially if you were dragging
a cooler in one hand and a kid who was fighting you in the other hand,you could even be yelling at them as long as you scolded them to throw everyone
off even other parents.
When one considers the numbers of people charged with sex crimes and murder and then compares the CURRENT TO THE CRIME population dynamics of the
areas we see that the dynamic situation is a criminals paradise,and I mean serious criminals not cooler thieves.
I believe that the numbers are not reflective of anything epic or that noteworthy considering the dynamics of the populations in the areas most of the
disappearances have happened in.
What the books really point out is that the National Parks service is COVERING UP THE FACT THAT CRIMINALS HAVE CARNIVALS ON THEIR PREMISIS AND THEY
CANNOT EVEN COME CLOSE TO MAKING THE PARKS SAFE.
!000 sex crime freaks can take one kid from a national park which is the best place for them to hunt because it is the safest and we can extrapolate
the numbers of kids that we lose every year because 1000 is a vast understatement of the number of fiends out there.
In ten years at only 1000 freaks that is 10,000 kids,so we can see easily that because there are far more than 1000 murderous sexual predators
committing crimes every year and because the Ntl Parks are PRIME huntimg ground for them that there MUST be many many more missing kids from these
areas.When we consider the skewed population dynamics of busy Parks and then apply the national average number of murderous child predators we can see
how the numbers correlate and make sense.
But this does not explain the weird cases where kids are taken many many kms away over impossible terrain and then are found alive,cases where they
have travveled impossible distances.
But these kids have been recovered.
I doubt any Military would commit abductions close to their installations,or that they would allow any ETs to commit such crimes consistantly enough
to be noticed.
I doubt any hidden underground civilisation would risk being discovered and invaded to abduct a few hundred people.
I do not doubt that ETs would abduct anyone they chose from any Park they chose with no impunity.But the sightings would be high in number in that
I simply think some of the cases were unique and that the main thrust of most research has been pointing out that the information was being actively
suppressed by the Parks Services using administrative costs and roadblocks.
All you need to do is get numbers on how many people go through natl Parks per year,then apply Ntl crime rates to that number,then adjust for
environmental dynamics creating a prime hunting ground and bring up certain numbers,then look at the numbers of disappearances and crimes and you will
get a clearer statistical picture of the overll situation,which in my opinion is not really note worthy,other than the organised suppression to
support business which is no different than any other business trying to keep its image clean.
How can anyone realisticlly claim that it is possible to make National Parks safe for people at any time,never mind when they are busy,simply take
statistics on numbers of police present per capits in cities which have populations the size of maximum capacity Natl Parks and SEE IF THE PARKS HAVE
ENOUGH POLICEMEN AND WOMEN,.....not Wardens,but police.
Now take the obvious SHORTCOMING in law enforcement in these areas and adjust your numbers again and we see that the overalll numbers we talk about
are not out of line with the dynamics whatsoever.
There is nothing to comment on beyond the fact that the National Parks System seems to be suppressing information by making it difficult to
obtain,data that would point out a PRIMARY weakness in Public Safety in National Parks,a PRIMARY Weakness that they CANNOT EFFECTIVELY REPAIR within
their current or future working business models,it is not possible.The last thing they want is the press riding these types of stories.
They just cannot fix the crime dynamics without bringing in a definate number of pure law enforcement people,a number that is SOP. And if you do the
quick math you see that there is no way they could EVER manage to do this effectively.
All I see here is a conspiracy to cover up the inherant dangers of going to any National Park,to cover up the derelict ways Parks are being run and
the danger people are being put in by this lack of due dilligance on behalf of the National Parks Departments.
The numbers are simply not that impressive.
Simply using the word cluster,doesnt do much for me,the real numbers taken in the proper context show nothing un usual at all,in fact they show a
surprisingly lower overall crime rate than the numbers would suggest while at the same time the number of specific crimes like child abduction are
specific degrees higher which fit prime hunting territory parameters for predators.
And even the odd cases like the ones even i think are BF can be easily fit into the structured dynamics of normal crime and weird report numbers.
Whenever a certain number of people are in groups specific things seem to happen with statisticlly repeating patterns.