originally posted by: Phantomfire707
a reply to: 2012newstart
They want me to support Pope Francis in everything he does in a most prophetic way.
The above statement from a couple of days ago, seems to me to be true at times, but it is not entirely correct.
The words "in everything he does" do NOT belong there.
They (or maybe he) do not ask for direct support, but what they cajole (also implied threats) is that persons of interest go down a particular path
that they assume the person moving along that path will arrive at place where they would than give Benedict XVI a declaration of complete confidence
in Pope Francis' prophetic authority to make radical changes.
What is the problem with that? For one, I know enough of the more authentic prophecies, to know that one who does such a thing under their own
possible mistaken prophetic identity takes a big risk with their soul. If your right about everything, than good for you! (for me). If there is a 4
percent chance you are delusional and wrong about your perceived identity (prophetic type) or wrong about the true identity of the bearer of papal
authority during real prophetic times, well.... 4% is a big risk to take with the eternal soul, for these utterly grave prophetic matters.
Two, I am not 100% certain of the prophetic identity of Pope Francis. Is he the last true Pope?, is he part of a group that used technology to create
a set of illusions that inevitably led to the resignation of the prior Pope? Is he the 2nd final Pope? is he the fifth last Pope?
And three, the prophecies are precise enough that I do not need to take a position (for anyone in the Vatican to hear and be convinced) on the Pope's
right to make upsetting immediate changes in the Church. A true Pope at this stage knows if he is innocent of what the prophecies indicate.
If the most embraced prophecy says the Antichrist's mother will be a nun, and everyone accuses a particular person of being the Antichrist, that one
person knows if the accusations are false or true. That particular person knows if his mother is a nun or not and if the prophecy fits.
If a prophecy states that the anti-Pope will have three nipples, the person accused of being an anti-Pope knows if he has a secret third nipple or
not.
Pope Francis knows his true identity in relation to prophecy (anti-Pope prophecies Vs. true Pope prophecies Vs. false prophecies), I on the other
hand, do not need to know by which path the Argentinian became the current Pope: 96 authentic acceptable paths vs. 4 deceptive paths.
It is his business and no other regarding this truth. When the time to know has arrived, it becomes known.
At this point in time, an anti-Pope would know the truth because they would have read the prophecy after coming to power and the prophecy says: "I
know what you did before it happened, and this is what you did, and that is why you are in power."
At this period in time, at the end of the period, the anti-Pope knowing the prophecy foretold his actions, and knowing the prophecy is true, the
anti-Pope endorses the true Pope at the proper moment in time according to the information provided by the prophecy. (Be it in support of a past pope
or future pope.)
Giving it a realistic 4 percent possibility of being the present reality.
ON THE OTHER HAND, with the other 96 percent possibility: the true Pope definitely knows that he is falsely accused. The true Pope might make
agreements, the true Pope might work for Peace, but at the end of the prophetic day, no latter than when time for prophetic actions has expired, when
the catastrophe and global collapse has begun or is at hand. The elder true Pope says at that decisive moment: I will not give in to your blackmail
and false accusations, I will not give in to your falsehoods and precepts of man, I will not give in to your spiritually sick and mentally ill
advisers. It is by divine royal command that I bring the radical Will of God to the Church, not even if every single one of you is against me, shall I
relent from wiping clean the rot and bringing the Church into the light of Christ.
However,
It would be a big tragedy for conflict to break out in the middle of Religious Rome if it turns out that the Global Earthquake is 30 years latter.
IN FACT, the rejection of the Pope's authority is not at all PROPHETICALLY justified if the Global Earthquake is even 15 years latter.
--------
I also wrote a couple days ago:
"If they push through with their changes. I say maybe they are wrong, maybe they are right, why make it my business, time will tell..."
To be more precise: There is always a background. If they push through with their changes in a background that does not provide a clear picture, I
take no position (actually -- highly likely -- that I shall have myself willingly banned from this forum before that possibility arrives). However,
some background scenes are simply too compelling to not cause a strong belief and position: if the background gives clear positive context, I would
have to declare personal support for the right of this Pope to make such changes, despite possible lack of support by many other fans of prophecy.
Key prophecy does indeed encourage radical changes within the Church.
But the same prophecy also reject radical changes at some point.
P. Benedict XVI, Pope Francis, Cardinal Bertone, and others within their small circle know this already.
Some big events prophesied for latter, occurring after or during the conflict, provide hindsight afterwards of what is God's Will for the Church. It
pertains to God's rejection of certain prior developments in Rome.
And still, It is a big tragedy for a conflict to break out in the middle of Religious Rome if it turns out that the Global Earthquake is 30 years
latter.
edit on 13-8-2015 by Phantomfire707 because: (no reason given)
edit on 13-8-2015 by Phantomfire707 because: (no reason
given)
edit on 13-8-2015 by Phantomfire707 because: (no reason given)
edit on 13-8-2015 by Phantomfire707 because: (no
reason given)
edit on 13-8-2015 by Phantomfire707 because: (no reason given)
edit on 13-8-2015 by Phantomfire707
because: (no reason given)
edit on 13-8-2015 by Phantomfire707 because: (no reason given)
edit on 13-8-2015 by
Phantomfire707 because: (no reason given)
edit on 13-8-2015 by Phantomfire707 because: (no reason given)
edit on
13-8-2015 by Phantomfire707 because: (no reason given)
edit on 13-8-2015 by Phantomfire707 because: (no reason
given)
edit on 13-8-2015 by Phantomfire707 because: (no reason given)