a reply to: 2012newstart
There is conflict in the Vatican.
Pope Francis wants to make significant changes in the Church.
E. Benedict XVI points to prophecy and says to Pope Francis you cannot touch Sacred Tradition.
At first they both had an agreement which very much related to prophecy, but it was an agreement based on a false assumption of some of the facts, and
the agreement fell through.
Nevertheless, Pope Francis wants a workable agreement. Benedict XVI was not so interested and instead threatened schism.
Pope Francis gets upset. He says schism is a declaration of war.
There is a formula within the prophecy that encourages big changes within the Church.
There is also a part within the prophecy that encourages opposition to changes within the Church.
In that regard the prophecy is a hot mess with two Popes in Rome with different interpretations.
E.P. Benedict XVI says tradition. Pope Francis says mercy and love.
Regarding changes, there are possible issues of timing, persons involved, persons not involved and sequencing related to other prophetic events.
Pope Francis often speaks of war. Maybe as much as a quarter of the time that he speaks about war he is actually reminding Emeritus Pope Benedict XVI
of the destruction and high price of war that would come from following through with this kind of schism.
Pope Francis repeats in his Sermons: Dialogue, Dialogue, Dialogue. It is often an internal appeal for dialogue to resolve such issues.
They are often words directed at emeritus pope Benedict XVI and maybe directed at a few others.
With Pope Francis' very strong desire to open the Church to everybody (and make his mark on history), and with a differing opinion from Pope
Benedict, it is an uneasy calm that could breakout in acrimony and violence at the heart of religious Rome.
The truth is that every side wants Peace. Pope Benedict does not wish to have a situation that leads to violence in the Vatican . Nor of course does
Pope Francis want to have a situation of persecution in the Vatican.
What would be ten times more the shame, is that they engaged in such actions and conflicts -- which is very much a prophecy based conflict -- and it
turned out they were wrong about the timing of when all this should happen.... wrong by 30 years! Oops!
Big whooper of an Oops!
With this simmering dangerous situation in the background, I want nothing more than to avoid the Fatima topic.
But it is precisely with this dangerous background in place that the top of the recognized power holders have intentionally made me feel that I am
viewed as a significant threat by the Pope. They(pope) wanted me to feel in danger, and indeed I feel that I am in grave danger with the threat of
schism hanging between Francis and Benedict. They want me to support Pope Francis in everything he does in a most prophetic way. But I want a Russian
Nazi to come to power first by coup d`etat (which might happen 15 or 20 years from now instead of now) and I want knowledge of whether Dominic the
Filipino has correct prophetic insight before I go support any Pope in such a big way....so as to avoid deception from the top and to avoid major
exploitation, and to avoid other peoples potentially false prophecies. (Are they interested in only avoiding scandal? Maybe.)
Or at least, I want massive agreement from heaven that succumbing to their tactics is the right course of action.
It is the deepest truth that I feel another person is/will be the prophetic figure regarding the very last one. Things change.
I do not want to consider an imminent chastisement, I kicked the can a good 15 years into the future.
If they push through with their changes. I say maybe they are wrong, maybe they are right, why make it my business, time will tell, I will let time
tell me the truth unless a big sign happens above the Pope's head in the first day or first three days from the potential moment of changes. It is
especially not my interest what they do, if they push through their changes now but the chastisement happens 15 or 30 years latter. And I say that I
am more interested in other matters anyway while everyone else will push their opinions of that matter when (if) that day comes.
An Anti-Pope? He would be the last Pope elected by the Cardinals before the global earthquake, but believe me, I expect the global earthquake to
happen latter not sooner, and I would expect some deceptive false alarms on other fronts before we get to that point. If it happens soon, shrug my
shoulders, probably not, but no worries, the truth must be revealed at some point.
Whatever the situation, they (the Pope) have attempted to cajole me, and have made me feel their threats, intending to protect their political
interests (the Pope's interests) with implied threats of violence. Bluffing? Don't know.
I want peace, they want peace, let's have peace based on reasonableness and reality, and based on patience and attempts at holiness, instead of
religious persecution that leads to fires of hell.
edit on 11-8-2015 by Phantomfire707 because: (no reason given)