It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mtnshredder
rception most have on AR style vs bolt-a/lever rifles. I had a tricked out AR style 10/22 with a 100 rnd clip that looked more deadly to most than a .700 nitro express elephant gun. So I do understand were your coming from in that respect. Cheers
originally posted by: skunkape23
a reply to: mtnshredder
The advantage in the war theater of a .223, is that it can, more often than not, cause severe injury without killing the target. For some enemies, this means you take multiple opponents out of the field by injuring one because it takes a few more to render aid. It depends on the mentality of who you are fighting. Some won't give a second thought to trying to rescue their own.
originally posted by: SM2
That is wildly innaccurate, if it takes the same time to fire 10 aimed shots from a semi as it does to chamber 1 round in a lever or bolt action, then the person with the lever/bolt action needs to just go the other way. Spray and pray is popular method of "marksmenship" i see heh
So again, I would say, use a semi auto .308.
originally posted by: Elton
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Well pardon my mistake, sir.
If we are having some sort of extreme range conflict you are probably correct, but to disregard the speed at which you can fire and reload the weapon while talking about lethal seems to be ignoring a lot.
Military does not go for lever action carbines, I suspect the Rate of Fire is important to them in determining how lethal a weapon is.
originally posted by: waltwillis
originally posted by: neversaynever
I read somewhere that a study was done in the vietnam war and it was found that for automatic weapons only 1 kill was registered for every 9400 rounds fired in the war. In comparison for snipers it was something like 2.3 rounds per killl. a reply to: Elton
Vietnam and a host of other dirty bush wars introduced the ambush concept of very high rates of fire, light ammunition and firepower.
The number of rounds per kill tripled from WWII levels to a staggering 50,000 rounds for each kill.
In Vietnam, the light and deadly M-16 became the overwhelming choice of ground troops. 1.33 rounds per sniper kill...
Enemy Casualties caused by US soldiers
-----------------------------------------------
WW I -- 7,000 rounds/casualty
WW II -- 25,000 rounds/casualty
Korea -- 50,000 rounds/casualty
Vietnam -- 200,000-400,000 rounds/casualty
originally posted by: MyHappyDogShiner
This gun is creepy too, old school tactical nastiness converted to a long barrel, locked stock SPORTING RIFLE.
SPORTING RIFLE-SPORTING RIFLE-SPORTING RIFLE.
Not sub-machine gun.
Already had a problem with the neighbors freaking out when they saw the thing.
Time to move....
originally posted by: ANNED
originally posted by: waltwillis
originally posted by: neversaynever
I read somewhere that a study was done in the vietnam war and it was found that for automatic weapons only 1 kill was registered for every 9400 rounds fired in the war. In comparison for snipers it was something like 2.3 rounds per killl. a reply to: Elton
Vietnam and a host of other dirty bush wars introduced the ambush concept of very high rates of fire, light ammunition and firepower.
The number of rounds per kill tripled from WWII levels to a staggering 50,000 rounds for each kill.
In Vietnam, the light and deadly M-16 became the overwhelming choice of ground troops. 1.33 rounds per sniper kill...
Enemy Casualties caused by US soldiers
-----------------------------------------------
WW I -- 7,000 rounds/casualty
WW II -- 25,000 rounds/casualty
Korea -- 50,000 rounds/casualty
Vietnam -- 200,000-400,000 rounds/casualty
These numbers are very misleading.
In WW1 you had bolt action rifles and few aircraft.
In WW2 you had M1s and a lot of aircraft
90% of rounds were fired from and at aircraft, Many as antiaircraft from ships and air to air from bombers.
Korea you had few enemy aircraft but a lot more light and heavy machine guns.
Then you come to Vietnam.
A lot of rounds were use as air to ground. AC-47 Spooky ("Puff, the Magic Dragon)" and AC130H Spectre.
plus large numbers of helicopter gunships like the huey gun ships with miniguns and other helicopter gunships.
about 85% of rounds fired were air to ground.
originally posted by: ArnoldNonymous
This is a great thread and I enjoy your op, but I would consider the range for the .308 round to be closer to 1,000 yards rather than 500.
In fact there are reports in the military where soldiers are tagging enemies from even further!
originally posted by: liejunkie01
I'm trying to talk the ole lady into buying a S&W m&p 15. She got over the "scary" factor.
Now it's just the cost, which isn't bad.
We don't "need" it she says. I beg to differ.
originally posted by: imitator
The mind set of owning modern blacked out weapons like the AR is very militaristic... thus makes the AR more dangerous.
It's not the size of the bullet that is dangerous, it's the mind set of the gun owner.