It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: smithjustinb
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
a reply to: smithjustinb
There is absolutely no point in having a conversation with you. You just throw straw man and ridiculous circular arguments to fit your 'beliefs', that aren't support by any kind of facts what so ever.
~Tenth
Mental disorder:
A mental disorder, also called a mental illness or psychiatric disorder, is a mental or behavioral pattern or anomaly that causes either suffering or an impaired ability to function in ordinary life (disability), and which is not developmentally or socially normative.
It is not developmentally normative. For sure. And procreative abilities to function are impaired. Therefore, its a mental disorder.
I want to believe you but citing the validity of the dsm and theroies is not gonna do it for anyone that sees what lies inside the covers. It is total control of all the masses.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: smithjustinb
That's why I'm advocating research. That's all I'm doing.
Medical and psychological experts have put decades of research into the DSM-V. They decided back in 1973 that homosexuality is a normal variation of human sexual orientation. It's different from the majority ... but it's a NORMAL VARIATION. Expected. Within norms. Not a mental illness. Research continues by the experts - including the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association - and those experts continue to state clearly that homosexuality is not a mental illness.
adjustment, in psychology, the behavioral process by which humans and other animals maintain an equilibrium among their various needs or between their needs and the obstacles of their environments. A sequence of adjustment begins when a need is felt and ends when it is satisfied. Hungry people, for example, are stimulated by their physiological state to seek food. When they eat, they reduce the stimulating condition that impelled them to activity, and they are thereby adjusted to this particular need.
originally posted by: smithjustinb
I read the link provided by Flyer's Fan and I remain unconvinced of the study's conclusiveness. The study that made the "final determination" that homosexuality was a normal variation of human sexuality involved analyzing the differences in gay people and straight people's "psychological adjustment"
adjustment, in psychology, the behavioral process by which humans and other animals maintain an equilibrium among their various needs or between their needs and the obstacles of their environments. A sequence of adjustment begins when a need is felt and ends when it is satisfied. Hungry people, for example, are stimulated by their physiological state to seek food. When they eat, they reduce the stimulating condition that impelled them to activity, and they are thereby adjusted to this particular need.
The problem with the study is that it doesn't address the link between sexual release and procreation. It only examines the relationship of adjustment of the desire for pleasure stimulated and resolved by the act of sex. But it doesn't examine the disposition of the earth to procreate as an end to a means of intercourse, which is the point I've been arguing all along. So, I remain unconvinced, but now my opinion is an educated one. As I suspected, the studies are inconclusive and require further research. I hope that one day, we can move past this emotionally charged rhetoric and get these people the treatment that some of them want and need.
psychology.ucdavis.edu...
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
I'm not entirely sure why you included the link that you discovered. This is from its conclusion: empirical evidence and professional norms do not support the idea that homosexuality is a form of mental illness or is inherently linked to psychopathology.
originally posted by: smithjustinb
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
I'm not entirely sure why you included the link that you discovered. This is from its conclusion: empirical evidence and professional norms do not support the idea that homosexuality is a form of mental illness or is inherently linked to psychopathology.
The conclusion was based on inconclusive studies. So its not much of a conclusion and doesn't hold much merit. Some websites conclude that aliens have been visiting earth for thousands of years because some cave drawings suggest so. In conclusion, not every conclusion is conclusive.
originally posted by: smithjustinb
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
That's nice. You still failed to recognize my argument for why I have determined that the studies are inconclusive, regardless of how much the inconclusive article claims the studies are conclusive. My argument for its inconclusiveness is found in the reply 5 posts up from this one, if you care to supply an actual counter argument.
originally posted by: begoodbees
It is not in ones dna, it is a learned behavior plain and simple. Deny ignorance please.
A 1992 study showed that the anterior commissure, a smaller connection between the brain’s two hemispheres, is larger in homosexual men than in straight men.
The anterior hypothalamus of the brain participates in the regulation of male-typical sexual behavior. The volumes of four cell groups in this region [interstitial nuclei of the anterior hypothalamus (INAH) 1, 2, 3, and 4] were measured in postmortem tissue from three subject groups: women, men who were presumed to be heterosexual, and homosexual men. No differences were found between the groups in the volumes of INAH 1, 2, or 4. As has been reported previously, INAH 3 was more than twice as large in the heterosexual men as in the women. It was also, however, more than twice as large in the heterosexual men as in the homosexual men. This finding indicates that INAH is dimorphic with sexual orientation, at least in men, and suggests that sexual orientation has a biological substrate.
Cerebral responses to putative pheromones and objects of sexual attraction were recently found to differ between homo- and heterosexual subjects. Although this observation may merely mirror perceptional differences, it raises the intriguing question as to whether certain sexually dimorphic features in the brain may differ between individuals of the same sex but different sexual orientation. We addressed this issue by studying hemispheric asymmetry and functional connectivity, two parameters that in previous publications have shown specific sex differences. Ninety subjects [25 heterosexual men (HeM) and women (HeW), and 20 homosexual men (HoM) and women (HoW)] were investigated with magnetic resonance volumetry of cerebral and cerebellar hemispheres. Fifty of them also participated in PET measurements of cerebral blood flow, used for analyses of functional connections from the right and left amygdalae. HeM and HoW showed a rightward cerebral asymmetry, whereas volumes of the cerebral hemispheres were symmetrical in HoM and HeW. No cerebellar asymmetries were found. Homosexual subjects also showed sex-atypical amygdala connections. In HoM, as in HeW, the connections were more widespread from the left amygdala; in HoW and HeM, on the other hand, from the right amygdala. Furthermore, in HoM and HeW the connections were primarily displayed with the contralateral amygdala and the anterior cingulate, in HeM and HoW with the caudate, putamen, and the prefrontal cortex. The present study shows sex-atypical cerebral asymmetry and functional connections in homosexual subjects. The results cannot be primarily ascribed to learned effects, and they suggest a linkage to neurobiological entities.
The anterior commissure, a fiber tract that is larger in its midsagittal area in women than in men, was examined in 90 postmortem brains from homosexual men, heterosexual men, and heterosexual women. The midsagittal plane of the anterior commissure in homosexual men was 18% larger than in heterosexual women and 34% larger than in heterosexual men. This anatomical difference, which correlates with gender and sexual orientation, may, in part, underlie differences in cognitive function and cerebral lateralization among homosexual men, heterosexual men, and heterosexual women. Moreover, this finding of a difference in a structure not known to be related to reproductive functions supports the hypothesis that factors operating early in development differentiate sexually dimorphic structures and functions of the brain, including the anterior commissure and sexual orientation, in a global fashion.
“There’s a very, very small group of people who want to keep the party in the past.
The new anti-gay language never came up for debate before roughly 7,000 delegates ratified a Texas GOP platform that tea party groups succeeded in pushing further to the right, including winning a harder line on immigration.
including winning a harder line on immigration
originally posted by: whyamIhere
originally posted by: smithjustinb
originally posted by: FlyersFan
a reply to: smithjustinb
You just described gender reassignment surgery.
That's a totally different subject than homosexuality.
Yet when discussing this issue on a political scale, LGB is proceeded with a T.
I think they added a "Q".
I think it stands for Queer. not 100% sure.
Carry on..
originally posted by: begoodbees
how do you explain one identical twin (genetically identical) being gay and the other straight? It happens and has been studied.
It is not in ones dna, it is a learned behavior plain and simple. Deny ignorance please.
If one removes the false pretext that it is something one is born with then one must draw the conclusion that it is an affect of environment and life experience. And in turn should not be promoted to children as "normal" or even "ok". It should be treated as what it is and what it always has been. A social disorder that can be treated and prevented.
Now that that's out of the way, go Texas! Some one has to counter all of this ridiculous propaganda that is being pushed on the oh so gullible public.
originally posted by: smithjustinb
a reply to: HardCorps
We need to do more to increase the effectiveness of homosexual treatment programs. We need to support more extensive research programs that can find the brain impairments that lead to and cause homosexuality and develop medication or therapeutic processes which have an effect on these impaired regions of male and female brains.
In the meantime, we all need to treat any person with an impairment with the same respect that you would treat people with normal brains. Just like a person with down syndrome should not be bullied, but should be cared for, so should gay people.
What we don't need to do is encourage this illness. That can only propagate it and is counter-productive to a mentally stable and healthy society.
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: neo96
Well, there's this. Oh and this.
originally posted by: beezzer
Personally, I would endorse "treatment" for liberalism/progressive thinking before I would endorse "treatment" for gayness.
People are so stupid.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: smithjustinb
I can see that there is something wrong.
normal variant of human sexuality
normal variant of human sexuality
normal variant of human sexuality
Sinking in yet? People better educated than either of us have done research .. mountains of it .. and this is what they say ... normal variant of human sexuality.