It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: WhiteAlice
originally posted by: starviego
originally posted by: WhiteAlice
You do know that insinuating that someone has done something or intended to do something illegal in writing, even on a forum, is still libel and defamation, right?
Isn't that what the District Attorney does everyday? Anyway, it's not nearly as illegal as participating in a conspiracy to commit murder.
Which District Attorney? Last I checked, there were a whole lot of those. Powell was charged and pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a fire arm and the people who talked with him and checked out his story were obviously satisfied. They were the ones that actually did investigatory work to make their determination. You, on the other hand, are letting your imagination go wild coupled with promoting your own website and barely skirting accusing somebody who wasn't charged with anything more than the above of conspiring to murder. That IS defamation.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: sheepslayer247
As a father with two kids in public school, I'm beginning to think it may not be a good idea to send my kids to school. - See more at: www.abovetopsecret.com...
Send them to private or home school them.
It was a bad idea to send kids to public schools long before there were 'mass shootings'.
www.reuters.com...#
Army officials declined to speak directly about the case, except to stress that the Army has a strict policy on keeping weapons under lock and key and to indicate the type of gun used, an AR-15, was not likely a military-issued weapon.
“Any kind of weapon that is signed out or that is assigned to a soldier, that soldier is, under policy, not allowed to take that weapon home,” Army Reserve spokesman Captain Eric Connor said, adding the chances of a soldier taking a weapon without permission were slim.