It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neo96
Wow people are really trying to pin this on Hagel ?
Well that wasn't Hagel doing a 'victory' lap in the White House rose garden.
That was our 'commander' in chief.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: kruphix
Who does the Secretary of Defense take his orders from?
Who?
originally posted by: neo96
Wow people are really trying to pin this on Hagel ?
Well that wasn't Hagel doing a 'victory' lap in the White House rose garden.
That was our 'commander' in chief.
The past few years have seen the right wing abandon almost every principle they claimed to stand for.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: neo96
Wow people are really trying to pin this on Hagel ?
Well that wasn't Hagel doing a 'victory' lap in the White House rose garden.
That was our 'commander' in chief.
And rightly so...
The past few years have seen the right wing abandon almost every principle they claimed to stand for.
From "No man left behind"...to eff em, who cares.
If this was a GOP potus, the right wing would be cheering Bergdahl's return and chanting shame to anyone that questioned the virtue of the trade.
The USA places a greater value on the life of our Military than the rest of the world.
Hell, Israel traded 1,000 Palestinian militants for ONE Israeli soldier in 2011.
I really don't care about the manufactured outrage on the right. Our government did the right thing. No man left behind.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Indigo5
Obama broke the law, enter some people who don't really want to discuss it.
What the law requires:
Section 1035 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 requires the following before the transfer or release of a Guantanamo detainee:
• The Secretary of Defense must determine that the risk posed by the detainee will be substantially mitigated and that the transfer is in the national security interests of the United States.
• The Secretary of Defense must notify the appropriate committees of Congress at least 30 days before the transfer or release of a Guantanamo detainee.
• The Secretary of Defense must provide detailed information regarding the circumstances of the transfer or release along with the notification, including how the risk posed by the detainee will be substantially mitigated, the security arrangements in the receiving country, and an assessment of the capacity, willingness, and past practices of the receiving country.
Source: Cornell Law - Secretary Of Defense
(a) There is a Secretary of Defense, who is the head of the Department of Defense, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. A person may not be appointed as Secretary of Defense within seven years after relief from active duty as a commissioned officer of a regular component of an armed force.
(b) The Secretary is the principal assistant to the President in all matters relating to the Department of Defense. Subject to the direction of the President and to this title and section 2 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401), [1] he has authority, direction, and control over the Department of Defense.
originally posted by: eriktheawful
"No man left behind." assumes that he didn't want to be where he was......that he was captured while performing his duties like other military personnel.
When you walk from your post, commit desertion, and actively seek out the very people you are suppose to be engaging, and instead, start helping them?
The House Committee on Armed Services on Wednesday will question Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel on why the Obama administration failed to obey a new law requiring the White House to notify Congress 30 days before releasing any Guantanamo Bay terrorists.
The hearing is expected to be contentious in examining last weekend’s swap of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl for five Taliban leaders held at the prison.
Read more: www.washingtontimes.com...
All that said...I am 99% certain I know how this went down. The trade discussions were ongoing, Hagel and the Pres. and everyone involved knew if they notified Congress, it would be a month of GOP on CNN playing it up as Pres. Obama soft on terrorists etc. Bergdahl likely would have his head chopped off and the video posted on the internet.
Congress not among top 90 to learn of Bergdahl trade Read more at www.wnd.com...
Members of Congress on Monday learned they were not among the top 90 people to be told of the deal President Obama cut with terrorists for the release of five top Taliban commanders at Guantanamo Bay in exchange for a U.S. soldier. Read more at www.wnd.com...
originally posted by: Destinyone
a reply to: Indigo5
Announced on the news today. Hagel will go before a special committee tomorrow, to answer IF he was the sole reason for the trade.
It will be interesting to see him testify from under the bus...