posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 08:08 AM
what bothers me about people who do know as much about the area's linguistics, in that timeframe, is that they really try to downplay or outright
ignore sumerian data and many resort to just suggesting everything sumerian is sitchin's work, which is of course, wrong. what's happened is, the
information didn't come out of the ground for nearly 6000 years, and when it did, there was so much already written and put into university
textbooks, critical works and the like, that would be proven wrong by sumerian stuff, that it's treated like it doesn't exist or is some conspiracy
have you connected the name for jupiter in say, babylon or earlier, to see if there's any additional information to be gleaned? i mean seems to me
that refusal to refer to the older works of sumer, is helping to keep the whole thing mired in obscurity.