It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9/11 Museum’s Biggest Oversight: No Mention of WTC Building 7

page: 9
47
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 17 2014 @ 02:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Euphem
I can think for myself....providing a link to a blog called screwloosechange is idiotic to say the least.

But but but I heard it on the internet...

So it MUST be true.






posted on Jun, 17 2014 @ 02:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Murgatroid

hehe I remember that commercial



posted on Jun, 17 2014 @ 02:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: samkent
Face it you have no PROOF of this grand conspiracy you believe in.


"We will know that we have succeeded when everything the public believes is false." ~ William J. Casey

Wonderful job affirming what the former director of the CIA once told us.


The proof is right in front of your face.

You just haven't learned to recognize it yet.



posted on Jun, 17 2014 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Murgatroid

Exactly. Either he hasn't learned to recognize it yet, or just refuses to believe something so evil exists.



posted on Jun, 18 2014 @ 03:40 AM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce




You really should not believe the many lies in 'loose change!


yet NO ONE can show the lies, including you....you all refer to a posting of , someone, "TELLING" of the lies within??


but that is a topic fro another thread isn't it....another thread you avoid.



posted on Jun, 18 2014 @ 03:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: hgfbob
yet NO ONE can show the lies, including you


Still wrong, if you actually followed the thread and read the links you would have seen the lies....



posted on Jun, 18 2014 @ 03:52 AM
link   
a reply to: InhaleExhale




And again how does hearing explosions and seeing the damage on the lower floors prove it was explosives in Building 7 that brought it down.



tell ya what.....PROVING FIRE, as officially claimed, will automatically NULLIFY all other theories......right!!!!!!!!

oops....my mistake....proving FIRE at ONE end of the building causing a "brand new never before seen physics phenomenon" as OFFICIALLY claimed it did in 2008 by the NIST hypothesis crew.


"the phenomenon that we saw on 9/11 that brought this particular building down was really thermal expansion, which occurs at lower temperatures."


lol..."Low Temp Thermal Expansion" is the hypothesized cause of 105 vertical feet of global unified acceleration equal to g. found occurring within the first 1/3 of WTC7's 6.5 second collapse.

new science they refuse to prove through science.

I have all these same postings on the other threads, go there and discuss it if you dare.



posted on Jun, 18 2014 @ 03:55 AM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce




Still wrong, if you actually followed the thread and read the links you would have seen the lies


wanna hear a LIE......tell me all about the claimed new science that the 2008 NIST hypothesis crew claims fell 7


"the phenomenon that we saw on 9/11 that brought this particular building down was really thermal expansion, which occurs at lower temperatures."


why don't YOU post what yer 'links' say about that.....



posted on Jun, 18 2014 @ 03:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: hgfbob
why don't YOU post what yer 'links' say about that.....


This shows that you do not actually read threads or follow links that you post in.... as if you did read threads and follow links you would have seen exactly what my links were about!



posted on Jun, 18 2014 @ 04:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: hgfbob
why don't YOU post what yer 'links' say about that.....


This shows that you do not actually read threads or follow links that you post in.... as if you did read threads and follow links you would have seen exactly what my links were about!





lol...I rest my case......POINT TO THE NEW SCIENCE claimed to fall WTC7 by the 2008 NIST hypothesis crew.


I know what is there.....NOTHING!

the reason you avoid posting anything direct...the reason you just throw a BIG comfy blanket over everything.


edit on 18-6-2014 by hgfbob because: I addded more to chew on



posted on Jun, 18 2014 @ 08:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Euphem
a reply to: InhaleExhale

Oh really Mr. Demolition expert. How many demolitions have you done or are an expert on that were on towers 1,368 ft tall?


I am after mature debate or discussion.

Enjoy your game, I don't want to play, your logic is flawed on some things or simply how express some things and when pointed out these are the types of replies received.



posted on Jun, 18 2014 @ 10:18 AM
link   
a reply to: hgfbob


No one can show the lies in Loose Change? Christ, even the people who made it said it had lies in it!



posted on Jun, 18 2014 @ 10:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: Euphem
a reply to: InhaleExhale

No you are right. It all makes sense now!

Since the destruction of all 3 buildings were examples of how a perfect demolition should go, and a demolition company probably couldn't do it any better anyways, I am going to start a new demo company. Instead of using explosives we will just fly things into them instead.

bingo bango donzo


A "perfect demolition" hurls bits of debris 400 feet? I don't think so.



posted on Jun, 18 2014 @ 11:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce
This shows that you do not actually read threads or follow links that you post in.... as if you did read threads and follow links you would have seen exactly what my links were about!

I think it's pretty obvious what your links are about...

MOST here have had enough MSM BS for one lifetime.

Your MSM "sources" are nothing but stealth propaganda.

Sharing links to Soros funded sites such as Snopes, or MSM sites like National Geographic only furthers the agenda of TPTB regardless of whether or not you believe they exist or not.

Nothing personal, but whining about "silly claims" and hoaxes while using known propaganda to backup your claims doesn't do a whole lot for ones argument.

The end result: zero credibility.


Mass media is the most powerful tool used by the ruling class to manipulate the masses. It shapes and molds opinions and attitudes and defines what is normal and acceptable.

Mind Control Theories and Techniques used by Mass Media

The mainstream media appears to serve multiple functions. First, to distribute information that the controlling cabal wants you to believe is real news. Secondly, to assist in the cover-up of information that has leaked out through other sources. In other words, Damage Control. Thirdly, as a weapon to assassinate the characters of those who expose the practices of the Establishment. Also, to act as a firewall to prevent information detrimental to the elite's control from reaching the public. Finally, to continue to reinforce mainstream accounts of current and historical events. The mainstream news essentially serves as a primary tool for social conditioning or mind-control.

"It is through the press and the media that the lie is penetrating through to the masses," declared Professor Marrs. The media is used as a weapon. So when you watch, read, or listen to mainstream news, ask yourself, "what will the CFR like me to believe today?"

Centralized Control of History, Media, and Academia



posted on Jun, 18 2014 @ 11:13 AM
link   
a reply to: JuniorDisco




A "perfect demolition" hurls bits of debris 400 feet? I don't think so.


A gravitational collapse hurls bits of debris 400 feet? I don't think so.



posted on Jun, 18 2014 @ 11:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Flatcoat

So it's a perfect demolition that doesn't look like a perfect demolition?

Tell me more.



posted on Jun, 18 2014 @ 11:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Murgatroid


Is every source apart from the ones that agree with you in on this? So like the Guardian Newspaper in Britain actually has been pretending to hate Dubya for all these years?



posted on Jun, 18 2014 @ 11:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Flatcoat
a reply to: JuniorDisco




A "perfect demolition" hurls bits of debris 400 feet? I don't think so.


A gravitational collapse hurls bits of debris 400 feet? I don't think so.


I am not saying the twin towers fell in such a fashion

But why couldn't a gravitational collapse hurl bits of debris out that far?



posted on Jun, 18 2014 @ 12:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: JuniorDisco
Is every source apart from the ones that agree with you in on this? So like the Guardian Newspaper in Britain actually has been pretending to hate Dubya for all these years?

You MISSED the point...

I love truth.

Do you love truth?

The MSM does NOT love the truth.

What part of lies do you not understand?

FYI: we are on the same side.



posted on Jun, 18 2014 @ 12:53 PM
link   
a reply to: InhaleExhale

Because gravity generally works vertically. In many of the videos you can see huge chunks of steelwork propelled horizontally at high speeds, some even impaling surrounding buildings.



new topics

top topics



 
47
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join