It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Loose Change is a "documentary" movie produced by Dylan Avery, Korey Rowe, and Jason Bermas that has received widespread attention on the Internet — and that does not bode well for evaluating the intelligence of the billions that use it. Through monstrously poor logic it attempts to "prove" that the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks were a false flag operation carried out by the United States government, specifically by high ranking members of the Bush administration. Claims made by the movie have been proved false so many times that there have been several updates in which bogus claims have been removed, although the hypothesis has been unaffected. No one knows why it is called "Loose Change," though that is theorized to be the sound you hear whenever the people who produced it shake their heads.
originally posted by: Euphem
a reply to: hellobruce
So the guy who was in the WTC 7 building, and was on TV on 9/11 right after being rescued, who said he heard many explosions in the building wasn't real?
I brought him up in a reply to someone saying prove it that there were explosions in WTC7.
He felt them, heard them, and saw the damage they caused on the lower floors as he was being rescued.
However, a first hand account of someone experiencing that(along with NIST not acknowledging it at all or even bothering to interview him) is concerning.
I am not insinuating that explosives were necessarily "planted" nor pointing fingers at anyone.
Why couldn't the damage on the lowers floors seen be from Oh I don't know two towers collapsing earlier on?
He felt them, heard them? If they were just outside or in a building close by why wouldn't he feel and hear them?
Yes many heard explosions that day. 2 planes did crash into buildings with much fire attacking anything it could reach, why wouldn't explosions be heard and how would one be able differentiate a detonation from a charge compared to a combustion explosion?
Is that what the nist report was for, to detail what witnesses heard or saw or was it a scientific paper examining the collapse and giving a cause?
He was interviewed, said what he said and died with unknown causes.
You said what he said was something unacceptable and died of unknown causes.
Not sure why you do not attempt at all to use your noggin to ask these questions of the story YOU believe to have taken place,
Anyone who can think freely of dogma, can easily see, that your beliefs, are far less likely to be the truth, no matter if you use science, probability, seeing who benefits, or HOWEVER you look at it, it serves to show us just how badly these guys have gotten most of the world,
Considering the timeline of his account from when he had heard explosions in relation to when the towers fell, they are at completely different times.
Have you even seen his interview? I would imagine you haven't otherwise you would already know the answer to this.
Well the NIST is a whole different story due to the amount of ties to the Bush family, but yes they were in charge of the investigation. They even stated in the report that there were no reports of any explosions in the building. Why not interview the two people who were inside that say otherwise? If it was just a scientific study they didn't need to mention that.
No you misread. In his interview he said that the official story was unacceptable. I never said anything was unacceptable.
I am just posting facts about what people who were there stated and what happened to them after. They speak for themselves really.
Since the destruction of all 3 buildings were examples of how a perfect demolition should go,
I am going to start a new demo company. Instead of using explosives we will just fly things into them instead.
originally posted by: ParasuvO
Well, I call it the REVELATION, those who see it, and those who do not or WILL NOT.
I have a friend who turned to a seat mate who had just sat down and said in his English accent: “Particularly nasty weather? The woman immediately got up and went to the stewardess and complained. She asked to have her seat changed because the gentleman next to her said, “Tickle your arse with a feather?” We see what we want to see and hear what we want to hear. www.joesugarman.com...
Modern Western culture is based on denying objective truth and erecting a false reality in its place. The New World Order is dedicated to replacing Truth with a solipsism created by the same people who create money from nothing and charge interest.
"We have already contrived to possess of the minds of the goy communities...[they are] looking through the spectacles we are setting astride their noses." (Protocols of Zion, 12)
Modern society is based on a solipsism created by Illuminati (Cabalist) Jewish bankers and their Masonic minions. The word "solipsism" means a self-created reality that has little or no connection with Truth. Instead of being dedicated to Truth, humanity has been hijacked by the bankers. The "New World Order" is a solipsism that stymies and enslaves mankind while increasing the bankers' power and wealth. We are being drawn into a solipsism that inverts good and evil; truth and lies. We are being inducted into a satanic cult.
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
What happened that day was an act of war, all acts of war are like any other acts in a play, they are not real, its an act to entertain our minds just as an act of war is an act to instill fear in our minds. The reasons and purposes we are fed by our own nations governing bodies are to keep a system of control alive and maybe make some profit for those at the top of these governing bodies.
"All war is based on deception." -- Sun Tzu, The Art of War
"Wars are all based on lies, could not be fought without lies" — Charles M. Young.
“All war in history has been hatched by governments, independent of the people’s interests, to whom war is always pernicious even when successful” ~ Leo Tolstoy