It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


9/11 Museum’s Biggest Oversight: No Mention of WTC Building 7

page: 20
<< 17  18  19   >>

log in


posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:23 AM
a reply to: cardinalfan0596

No, no. The conspirators involved a foreign news agency, editors, presenters and journalists in their plan. They told people at the BBC because, um, there was a script. Which had to be kept to.

And they needed to tell the BBC to report the building falling because otherwise the BBC might not have reported it. So as you can see it was much better to involve loads more people in the plan so as not to risk the collapse going unremarked.

You might think they'd not want to broadcast to the world about a building they had wired to explode. Especially as they would then have to rely on nobody at the BBC deciding to blow their cover. That they might just let it go down quietly and hope nobody picked up on it too much during the day. But you would be flat wrong.

posted on Aug, 23 2014 @ 06:56 AM
a reply to: GenRadek

Also, if you cannot figure out how thermal expansion could do what it did, consider this:

no .....LOW TEMP thermal expansion.....why do you ...people....ALWAYS leave that off when replying back????!

"the phenomenon that we saw on 9/11 that brought this particular building down was really thermal expansion, which occurs at lower temperatures."

the official claim from the 2008 NIST hypothesis crew PUSHED as truth is "LOW TEMP thermal expansion", a "NEVER before seen physics phenomenon" occurring in a STEEL framed building.....

now TELL ME HOW it removes the necessary resistance to allow GLOBAL UNIFIED CONSTANT acceleration EQUAL to g. INCLUDING 105 vertical feet of LOAD BEARING continuous vertical support....
8 floors of truss assemblies with carrier beams...
lateral, cross, and diagonal bracing throughout...
tens of thousands of bolts and welds...
Interior partitions...
office contents...

to enable the building to do this.....

NCSTAR 1A 3.6] "This free fall drop continues for approximately 8 stories, the distance traveled between t=1.75s and t=4.0s...constant, downward acceleration during this time interval. This acceleration was *9.8m/s^2*, equivalent to the acceleration of gravity."

NICSTAR 1A 4.3.4] Global Collapse..."The entire building above the buckled column region moved downward in a single unit, as observed, completing the global collapse"

NCSTAR1A p.39/130
"the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse of WTC 7."

What would happen if the long horizontal beams started to expand

..the ENTIRE building?

Things start to come under extra stresses that were not meant to be experienced.

the ENTIRE building?

then what happens when those failures start to cause internal floors to buckle, then fall, all around the critical beam.

really! the ENTIRE building....all BEFORE 1.74 seconds to ALLOW the global unified CONSTANT acceleration EQUAL to g.

With nothing holding it up and helping it stay stable, once it goes,

oh yes it does, once the vertical LOAD BEARING support is REMOVED....we see GLOBAL UNIFIED CONSTANT acceleration at a rate ONLY seen when there is a 'CLEAR PATH'!
...well that is up UNTIL this NEW physics phenomenon that took control of 9-11, ONLY on 9-11....

"the phenomenon that we saw on 9/11 that brought this particular building down was really thermal expansion, which occurs at lower temperatures."

come on general......ya need to do a little better than 'WHY'gning......

hey, tell me all about the Presidential Executive Order allowing NIST 2008 to NOT have to prove this NEW science with scvience....just BULLY to the masses.

posted on Aug, 25 2014 @ 01:34 PM
a reply to: lotsoftime

When you get back, care to explain what range of temps are you thinking of when they say "Low temp" thermal expansion. Like low temp = 400C? Low Temp = 100C? Low Temp = 0C?

Cause according to them, it occurred in the 400C range, when we know that fires can be much hotter. But steel is affected by heat that does not need to be searingly hot.

And again, you ignored the report which explains in detail why and how the acceleration occurred. To them it is no surprise and therefore not a big deal. But since you have a reading comprehension difficulty, you cannot begin to understand their explanation, which was even dumbed down for the media. Go back and reread the report. You should have some time now between reincarnations.

<< 17  18  19   >>

log in