It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You think you are the smartest one here with this "low temp thermal expansion" (what ever the hell that means) nonsense, and demand scientific evidence
Do you know what the FAQ from NIST is based from? THE ACTUAL REPORT! Do you really think that what the FAQ says is completely different from the report? Cause if so, then
I dont even think you are capable of rational debate or thought here.
It directly answers questions that (no doubt) were asked by people like you,
the 9/11 'OS' vs 'truther' debate still rages i see.
no way of proving or disproving any of it
with
endless opposing 'experts' 'disproving' each other
You THINK you are the smartest person in the room, you think that because you believe there to be some conspiracy behind 9/11 that there must be a conspiracy behind 9/11
any one who tries to tell you otherwise must be stupid because they disagree with you.
All you seem to have for your argument is this thermal expansion thing, you bring it up on every thread you have nothing else, just some flawed understanding of thermal expansion.
NCSTAR 1A 3.6] "This free fall drop continues for approximately 8 stories, the distance traveled between t=1.75s and t=4.0s...constant, downward acceleration during this time interval. This acceleration was *9.8m/s^2*, equivalent to the acceleration of gravity."
NICSTAR 1A 4.3.4] Global Collapse..."The entire building above the buckled column region moved downward in a single unit, as observed, completing the global collapse"
NCSTAR1A p.39/130
"the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse of WTC 7."
originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: biffcartright
Ok lets do a little test bob/sound/biff YOU post a link to a video of the WTC 7 collapse after you have watched it please tell us all at what time on the video the collapse of the building starts do you have the NADS to do that lets see !!!
NCSTAR 1A 3.6] "This free fall drop continues for approximately 8 stories, the distance traveled between t=1.75s and t=4.0s...constant, downward acceleration during this time interval. This acceleration was *9.8m/s^2*, equivalent to the acceleration of gravity."
NICSTAR 1A 4.3.4] Global Collapse..."The entire building above the buckled column region moved downward in a single unit, as observed, completing the global collapse"
NCSTAR1A p.39/130
"the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse of WTC 7."
"the phenomenon that we saw on 9/11 that brought this particular building down was really thermal expansion, which occurs at lower temperatures."
So what you mean is...
Shyam Sunder and the 2008 NIST hypothesis crew at WTC7 NIST technical briefing
"the phenomenon that we saw on 9/11 that brought this particular building down was really thermal expansion, which occurs at lower temperatures."
originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: biffcartright
Here is a fine example of low temperature thermal expansion causing problems not to a building but the transport system at far LOWER temperatures than a fire.
Sun Kinks
Its not new many large structures have to have expansion joints due to temperature changes purely due to weather, bridges for example I thought a so called master builder would be well aware of the problem.
"NIST is withholding 68,246 files. These records are currently exempt from disclosure. All input and results files of the ANSYS 16 story and the LS-DYNA 47-story global collapse model that were used to simulate sequential structural failures leading to collapse."
Instead of reposting the same garbage, how about you take a stop back and actually read the damn report.
originally posted by: biffcartright
originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: biffcartright
Here is a fine example of low temperature thermal expansion causing problems not to a building but the transport system at far LOWER temperatures than a fire.
Sun Kinks
Its not new many large structures have to have expansion joints due to temperature changes purely due to weather, bridges for example I thought a so called master builder would be well aware of the problem.
now tell me HOW this applies to WTC7?????
building are NOT built to expand at the joints.......never...
..never ever ever!!!!!!
and besides.....this 'thermal expansion' did NOT expand steel.
Expansion Joint Considerations for Buildings