posted on Jun, 15 2014 @ 04:47 PM
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
a reply to: bbracken677
first of all you brought up Stitchin (no that's not a typo I'm mocking your mocking him by misspelling his name. a very childish tactic of ad
hominem argument) I've been sticking to current scientific based topics and asking you to explain the parts science has no answer for currently. All
I get from you is "no one knows" so since you've reached the limits of what you got out of your degree you start focusing on the controversy around
First, you brought up "Stitchin" first. 2nd, you take "no one knows" totally out of context. A theory is a theory and not knowledge. Therefore a
theory is something which "no one knows for sure". You seem to want confirmed answers when there are none and by your constant twisting of
statements, you are the troll. Plain and simple, no?
And not only that, the "answers" you gave earlier on in our discussion showed clearly you are out of your realm as a geologist discussing this kind
of subject. Every time I press you on things like "why is the Moon dead if it accreted the same time as Earth?" or "Why isn't the custard skin on
Earth spread out evenly? why did it form all clumped together and then decide to start spreading out?" or "Why COULDN'T the Moon have been captured
if its companion collided with a larger, watery giant?" and all I got from you was "No one knows" ( well actually I think you said that last part
was possible and ironically for you that is one of Stitchin's contentions so you actually agree with him on that lol) and then when you have nothing
intelligent to say, or add or to make a coherent point all you want to do is focus on good ole Stitchin.
It's quite clear YOU DON'T KNOW JACK and are just here trolling
Well...then perhaps, since you do know all the answers, you should apply to the USGS for Godhood. All I can do is present current theory.
I focus on "good ole Stitchin" because you seemed to keep trying to draw me in that direction. Stitchin was a fraud and anyone buying into his crap
is a fool.
The capture, or creation model for our moon are theories and NO ONE KNOWS. This started with you questioning my using boiling water as an illustration
of how convection currents work, ergo, in a simplistic way, how convection currents work in the mantle. Any yet you maintained that plated tectonics
and mantle convection does not account for "all that we see". Funny, but when asked what it was that we saw that couldnt be accounted for you failed
to answer that (amongst many other questions I asked) and pressed on to the next subject: the capture or creation of the moon.
I will let others decide who is the true troll here. I will let others decide who presents science and who .. trolled. I am secure in my knowledge,
experience and I know an idiot when I speak to one.