It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kruphix
Note: This doesn't apply to someone wanting one single hand gun or shotgun for home protection, or someone who is a hunter and guns are part of their sport...I'm talking about the people who have multiple military type of weapons, who own small arsenals, and who think without their precious guns they will be killed immediately.
originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: Thecakeisalie
I honestly think it is because they are lacking in some other area in their life.
Either lacking self confidence, love, the ability to logically asses their level of danger, or compensating for not feeling manly enough...something is lacking in their life to make it so they think they need huge guns to be complete. Those that need the bigger and bigger guns are the ones that just scream insecurity to me.
At the core of it, I honestly don't think there is any other explanation.
Says the world famous Nobel prize winning psychologist,Krupfix!
Says the world famous clinical psychologist,krupfix!What exactly was your Nobel prize for again?
Note: This doesn't apply to someone wanting one single hand gun or shotgun for home protection, or someone who is a hunter and guns are part of their sport...I'm talking about the people who have multiple military type of weapons, who own small arsenals, and who think without their precious guns they will be killed immediately.
originally posted by: kruphix
Note: This doesn't apply to someone wanting one single hand gun or shotgun for home protection, or someone who is a hunter and guns are part of their sport...I'm talking about the people who have multiple military type of weapons, who own small arsenals, and who think without their precious guns they will be killed immediately.
originally posted by: kruphix
I honestly think it is because they are lacking in some other area in their life.
Either lacking self confidence, love, the ability to logically asses their level of danger, or compensating for not feeling manly enough...something is lacking in their life to make it so they think they need to control others to be complete. Those that need the bigger and bigger control and Govt are the ones that just scream insecurity to me.
At the core of it, I honestly don't think there is any other explanation.
originally posted by: macman
a reply to: Thecakeisalie
There is not need to define a reason why.
We have the right to do so.
Do you pose the same question as to why people have other things in their life?
originally posted by: macman
a reply to: Thecakeisalie
There is not need to define a reason why.
We have the right to do so.
Do you pose the same question as to why people have other things in their life?
originally posted by: kruphix
Other things in life don't have the sole purpose of killing other living things.
originally posted by: kruphix
Other things in life don't have the sole purpose of killing other living things.
originally posted by: kruphix
Yes, there does need to be a reason...your attempt at deflection shows that you have no valid reason.
Really???
Don't see where a "reason" is stated to be addressed in the 2nd. Nor in States to openly carry a firearm.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: macman
Really???
Don't see where a "reason" is stated to be addressed in the 2nd. Nor in States to openly carry a firearm.
Maybe you should read the 2nd Amendment again.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
We can split this up into three parts.
What is needed: A well regulate Militia
Why is it needed (THE REASON): Being necessary to the security of a free State
How to accomplish it: the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
So there is your reason...it is an outdated and no longer needed reason...but there it is.