Sgt. Bergdahl, An Intelligence Asset Endangered By Obama’s CIA Blunder?

page: 3
23
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 4 2014 @ 09:24 PM
link   
I agree this could be a possibility. We just wanted him out of there and the cover story didn't stick. So could it be a possibility that we just wanted to get those Taliban exchangees planted back over there for other reasons. There is far, far more to this, and it's probably not the obvious.




posted on Jun, 4 2014 @ 10:17 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

While an interesting idea, there is a big flaw in it, namely the six dead solders killed looking for him.

Inserting an operative should not have gotten others killed. There would be no need for it.

There are also much easier ways to insert an operative than to have them walk off from their posting in the army that WOULD cause them to be looked for.



posted on Jun, 4 2014 @ 10:25 PM
link   
a reply to: eriktheawful


Inserting an operative should not have gotten others killed. There would be no need for it.


Unless the whole thing backfired for some unknown reasons.

And since when does the CIA operate on sacred ground?

I'm sure they've jazzed up operations in the past.

Just look at the "outed" official last week.

But yes, the whole concept is skunky.



posted on Jun, 5 2014 @ 12:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: eriktheawful


Inserting an operative should not have gotten others killed. There would be no need for it.


Unless the whole thing backfired for some unknown reasons.

And since when does the CIA operate on sacred ground?

I'm sure they've jazzed up operations in the past.

Just look at the "outed" official last week.

But yes, the whole concept is skunky.





Yah, people do get killed when things go wrong.

But you normally do not want anyone getting killed. Dead bodies attract attention.

Even in a war zone.



posted on Jun, 5 2014 @ 05:00 AM
link   
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

Playing the role of defector would allow him to feed the Taliban desired information/misinformation that only a military personnel would know.



posted on Jun, 5 2014 @ 05:08 AM
link   
a reply to: eriktheawful

Yeah that's true, our government would never sacrifice 6 American soldiers lives in order to keep the cover on a top secret operation. They would just tell everyone in the military what's going on and trust that nobody would slip up. Human life is precious to our government and military/intelligence leaders, that's what people don't understand...

Curious that their plan to rescue/capture him failed... it's almost like they were looking in the wrong places or were fed false information. But we all know that would never happen. Being honest and telling the truth is sacred to our government and military intelligence leaders, that's what people need to understand.

But I suppose anything is possible...



posted on Jun, 5 2014 @ 07:18 AM
link   
Story You Haven't Heard About Bergdahls Desertion

When he deserted, the Army didn't go on a rescue mission.
They had orders to shoot him if they saw him.
That's how sure they were that he had defected and was aiding the enemy.



posted on Jun, 8 2014 @ 09:15 PM
link   


Tune in Monday night @ 10pm EST on atsliveradio.com





new topics

top topics



 
23
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join