It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I have quite a in depth knowledge of the events of 9/11 based on facts.
if your are interested, I have a massive 10,000 word thread with lots of links
I do not believe that WTC7 was a controlled demolition.
I am very well read.
Also i find it difficult to debate with a individual who has not so far, at least in this thread, stated what he/she believes caused the buildings to collapse.
if your are interested, I have a massive 10,000 word thread with lots of links, pictures and videos that provides some incite into why I do not believe that WTC7 was a controlled demolition.
"Whenever a theory appears to you as the only possible one, take this as a sign that you have neither understood the theory nor the problem which it was intended to solve."
Sir Karl Popper- Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (1972)
originally posted by: ChiefD
a reply to: _BoneZ_
Interesting that there have been no responses yet, but three flags on this.
I don't believe what this man is saying is true. There have been many books out that have debunked these conspiracy theories on 9/11.
originally posted by: VoxVirtus
a reply to: andr3w68
He lacks the years of schooling that it takes to get a degree in engineering. Like the people who say that this was MOST LIKELY not a controlled demolition.
You can't say "OH, he was there, so that makes him infallible in his testimony."
I respect him for his service to the public, and this man is braver that 99% of the population. But I don't think he knows what he is talking about.