It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Did you actually fail to notice all that information on memory retention and how stress affects it?
Each time the specific memory is even thought about, it is changed.
And if you cannot understand the information I am providing or even pay enough attention to what I am actually saying.
ALL OF THIS IS IN THE INFORMATION I PROVIDED YOU.
8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough “jargon” and “minutiae” to illustrate you are “one who knows”, and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.
22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.
originally posted by: GenRadek
a reply to: hgfbob
And every single one has been explained, debunked, or dismissed as nonsense, lies, misinformation, stupidity, ignorance, etc.
What she was describing was the initial interior collapses inside the North Tower. She is obviously mistaken as every video that was looking directly at the WTCs that day, show nothing of the sort happening anywhere in the middle of the North Tower. A helicopter pilot mentioned seeing interior floors at the impact sites collapsing, prior to full collapse. But no demolitions or detonations anywhere in the building. The explosions she is mentioning is more likely the explosions heard at the ground zero of the first collapse, where cars, trucks, fire trucks, ambulances, police vehicles, etc were exploding from fires/being crushed/impacted by debris, as well as ammunition cooking off in the debris pile.
There were signs of internal collapse. This would explain why fires were seen to come out more and more smoke appeared, plus the popping and explosion-like sounds. Remember, not all explosion sounds are caused by explosions. Would you be able to tell the difference between steel columns, supports, beams, etc snapping and breaking from say explosive charges?
Id read up on the NYPD reports here in regards to the North Tower prior to its demise.
And I know for a fact that the evidence has been posted here on ATS countless times.
In fact the whole site has very good observations and explanations that are easy to understand.
"the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse of WTC 7."
You mean to tell me, that, in a fire, that is spread across 10+ floors, each an acre in size, burning from end to end, with a 767 inside, is NOT going to have explosions being heard?
People in the "truth" movement need to realize that hearing explosions does not signify explosives. In easier terms: Hearing kaboom =/= bomb. Simple?
[NCSTAR1A 4.3.4] Basing the decision of "No explosives or accelerants were used" on videos that were recorded at the time of collapse. Based on visual and audio evidence and the use of specialized computer modeling...NIST concluded that a blast event did not occur
and TWO airliners burning!!
there are many NON-bomb/NON-explosive sources of "explosions" that one would expect in such a large fire. I wish I wish I wish people would get that through their thick skulls.
originally posted by: HarbingerOfShadows
a reply to: hgfbob
Not so much.
But I do see a lot of deflection above, not from me however.
I bet it's not even intentional.
resorting to ranting, gross generalization, wanton ignorance, and mindless ranting rejurgitation verbatum of party lines.
I was obviously talking about neuroscience.