It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ChiefD
a reply to: _BoneZ_
Interesting that there have been no responses yet, but three flags on this.
I don't believe what this man is saying is true. There have been many books out that have debunked these conspiracy theories on 9/11.
Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the "official investigation" blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure.
Except for the marginal benefit obtained from a three-day, visual walk-through of evidence sites conducted by ASCE investigation committee members- described by one close source as a "tourist trip"-no one's checking the evidence for anything.
However, respected members of the fire protection engineering community are beginning to raise red flags, and a resonating theory has emerged: The structural damage from the planes and the explosive ignition of jet fuel in themselves were not enough to bring down the towers.
The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately.
originally posted by: CagliostroTheGreat
a reply to: ChiefD
So what then? Why woulie he lie? The man's credentials are practically impeccable. I can't fathom, for the life of me, what he stands to gain by lying.
There have been many books debunking the original tale as well, what's your point?
originally posted by: stirling
the reason being that there have NEVER been any steel framed buildings such as these which fell due to fire....