It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Isla Vista Crisis Actors EXPOSED!!! ”Is My Director Talking?”

page: 4
14
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 30 2014 @ 12:20 PM
link   
wow I heard it clear as day as to what she said..

People in this thread need to listen with a pair of good headphones.

Your government is pulling a swifty on you and you don't see it. believe me gun control won't make America safer.
We banned guns in Australia guess who has all the guns now.. Its all the criminals with the guns.
Wish in 1996 we had technology we have today, Port Arthur would be exposed to the max as there would be more footage and interviews like this exposing the bs.
edit on 30/5/2014 by amraks because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 30 2014 @ 12:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: cestrup
a reply to: DelMarvel

Nice portrayal of "hoax believers". I'm sure you think the CIA has no involvement with the major news networks because you live in fantasy land. Personally, I'd rather live in the basement then to be so daft as you.



Nice straw man fallacy.



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 12:30 PM
link   
a reply to: cestrup

And I'll admit my "in the basement" comment was a little snarky. Let me rephrase.

Almost all the hoax believers (and those who are trolling) pushing these theories online are doing so mostly with youtube videos presumably made in their homes.

I very closely followed the Sandy Hook aftermath and I only ever saw a report from one person who actually went to Sandy Hook and they just drove around and shot video from their vehicle window.
edit on 30-5-2014 by DelMarvel because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 12:33 PM
link   
a reply to: DelMarvel

Not really - you have marginalized in nearly every post to make your arguments easier. But, to the trained eye - you're using fallacy every time. It just uncovers your agenda here - which is to stop people from thinking there's anything more to this tragedy. Which, you nor myself really know. That's why we have discussion, and agenda is why you're here presumably to disrupt it.



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 12:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: cestrup

That's why we have discussion, and agenda is why you're here presumably to disrupt it.



This shill card--Godwin's Law of discussions on conspiracy sites.

And one more thing---you and I and others here are aware that to varying degrees the media is in bed with the military and the government.

Associating that idea with this "crisis actor" nonsense makes everyone look like loons.

One could argue there's an agenda there, too.
edit on 30-5-2014 by DelMarvel because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 12:57 PM
link   
a reply to: DelMarvel


You obviously are. You're not a detective on the case and you try to illustrate anyone that has questions as looney. Should we go through your posts?? You definitely have an agenda and it's been obvious since your first post. You know just as much as the rest of us sheep about this tragedy yet you take the almight throne and can decree everyone stupid for questioning.

It doesn't strike you as odd, that the CNN interview, the girl mentions, "director"? What? Why? This is after the fact that I thought the father was disingenuous. Something stinks, to me and many other posters, and you're here to call us nuts or stupid. Yeah, that's fair. So, again, what's the point of you being here? If we're all just nuts, why even open this post? I don't go on sites where people believe we walked with dinosaurs and fight with them. Do you? Is that your schtick? If so, you're miserable



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 01:09 PM
link   
a reply to: cestrup

No it doesn't If you had any idea how TV interviews work they always have a director.
Again with the Father....why can't you accept grief is different for everyone.
Facts please not just BS views which are honestly doing no favors for the pro gun crowd.



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 01:16 PM
link   
a reply to: boymonkey74

I'm not pro or against guns. I don't care what people own. I just hope they follow the rules. So let's get that out of the way. Secondly, in most interviews there's a reporter and a camera man. Not a director on site and they definitely wouldn't be interacting with the interviewees. The reporters ask a bunch of questions then edit it back at the station. I worked for a huge communications network that owned many newspapers and television studios across the country. So stop with the lying. There's no director there and if there is, then there's definitely an agenda and actors. So, carry on.

Sadness of the loss of a child is not what I saw with this interivew or the laughing bastard in the SH case. Or the two looney parents who almost seemed happy their little girl was dead. You, although, make a nice point - you just accept where as the people you ridicule remain vigilent. That's the difference.


edit on 30-5-2014 by cestrup because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 01:23 PM
link   
a reply to: cestrup

Reporter, camera man producer/ director normally.
My best mate is a producer and I know this for fact.
Anyhow Iam out enjoy your delusions.
edit on 30-5-2014 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 01:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: cestrup

Reporter, camera man producer/ director normally.
My best mate is a producer and I know this for fact.
Anyhow Iam out enjoy your delusions.


This is a lie. Have a nice day though!



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 01:33 PM
link   
a reply to: cestrup

Here he is my best mate Dec.

uk.linkedin.com...

So again tell me Iam lying.
Also what about a sound man? the producer/director is not a lie either.
Do you have any idea about tv?.
Doesn't look like it.


edit on 30-5-2014 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: boymonkey74

Here's a link to my buddy too.

www.linkedin.com...



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 01:37 PM
link   
a reply to: cestrup

Believe what you want I don't give a toss...you are wrong as usual.



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 01:45 PM
link   
a reply to: boymonkey74

You obviously do give a toss and you don't know how a street/witness interview goes. The reporter is given a set of questions, over the phone or as she leaves the station - to ask. If you think there's a director onsite, during that CNN interview then you're the one who really has no idea what you're talking about. So who was that dark-haired girl refering to? I worked for Schurz Communications - www.schurz.com... - and worked for the newspaper and TV station, WSBT in South Bend, IN. As an account rep, I sometimes directed commericials for local business to be shown on TV. I knew all the reporters, who met or rode with camera men who conducted the types of interviews that those girls were supposedly doing. So, since you're all into proof and such - prove to me that there should have been a "director" to ask witnesses a few questions. Then, think, why should there be a director to ask some witnesses a few questions?


edit on 30-5-2014 by cestrup because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 01:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: jimmyx
geez....a guy told the girls "I'll be your director and tell you when we are ready for you"....happens all the time in the field with major media news crews. various directions were probably given..."louder"..."look this way"..."keep your head up"... "don't move around or sway"...etc.......


Simple but right.
Iam out.



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 01:59 PM
link   
a reply to: boymonkey74

Proof of this? Or is this an assumption that you agree with? Other than this being total bull#, I'd like for you to tell me, which guy, other than a real director (who's back at the station because he's not needed for simple Q&As with pedestrians) calls himself "director"? And this isn't a TV show - they aren't worried about posture, simply because they want it to seem realistic. They may have someone say "speak up" (the cameraman) but looking at a guy with the camera is very simple. So, I'm calling BS and I'm going to need proof of your assumptions...



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 02:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: cestrup
a reply to: DelMarvel
You obviously are.

I assume you are again accusing me of being a "shill."

Regarding your point that you know no more about this than the rest of us, here is your first post from the other thread:


originally posted by: cestrup
That man who is supposedly greiving the death of his son and passing the blame onto politicians/NRA is a total fraud IMO. There was nothing convincning about his spiel and to come out the next day and blame politicians, for # sake. I'm with the others who think this is all another experiment with media and crisis actors. They're on to something bigger and setting the stage. This who thing reeks of pure baloney. Of course I could be wrong but my impression is that this is staged.


I don't know what your situation in life is. I am a father and step-father of adult children. This is not dispassionate discussion of this issue as you keep claiming. This is not back and forth between anonymous posters on a conspiracy board. This is a vicious attack on an individual who is guilty of nothing besides being the father of a son killed by a maniac.



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 02:04 PM
link   
a reply to: cestrup

There are DOZENS of directors on newscasts when on location. DOZENS.

Why is it that people's ignorance always leads to claims of conspiracy?



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 02:07 PM
link   
a reply to: DelMarvel




This is a vicious attack on an individual who is guilty of nothing besides being the father of a son killed by a maniac.


sensationalize much? Vicious? This is my opinion and I'm sorry if it makes you upset, but it's mine. There's nothing vicious about it and since it's my opinion and not my fact - I could be wrong. Yes it is a back and forth discussion about the event. I was not the only person who thought that interview was off. I do think that interview was staged for political purposes. Is that not allowed?



posted on May, 30 2014 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: captaintyinknots

What? I'll need proof of this. More than just your opinion and an insult. I've worked in this industry. I have never seen our director out on the street helping out with interviews - and South Bend isn't a small market. Dozens of directors, huh? L-0-L



new topics

top topics



 
14
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join