Wikipedia Erases the A-B-C Preon Model From Its Database

page: 2
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on May, 31 2014 @ 05:48 AM
link   
a reply to: ImaFungi

Oh, okay; so you did include time - thanks for the clarification.

Still, I think the number of preon is independent from the number of dimensions.

For instance some models have more than 3 preons.




posted on May, 31 2014 @ 01:58 PM
link   
a reply to: swanne

Yes with my initial reply, I meant in no way that there was a relationship between ABC 123 preons and 3 dimensions. I merely was wondering if the entirety of this universe was a network of 3 different flavors of preons, according to the theory, and if they were lined throughout the universe touching. I was asking if that preon model suggests the entire universe is a grid of 3 different preons, like a computer screen or tv is a grid of 3 different pixel; red, green,blue, and from this simplicity comes all complexity by having different frequencies of energy interact at different points for different durations and sequences of time, creating larger clusters of coherent assemblage and the largest cluster, being the entirety of the networks energetic projection at any given moment.



posted on Jun, 2 2014 @ 01:17 PM
link   
a reply to: ImaFungi

This would imply that

-there is three fundamental frequencies

-these three things are present in vacuum also (since pixels are present even though the screen is black).

I think your proposition is actually very elegant - if a ToE was developed and happened to exhibit the properties you describe, I would pretty much support it. But for now we just don't know.

So far scientists are far from resolving everything to only 3 fundamental values. So far I was able to reduce gravitational patterns to 8 "fundamental values" (compared to about a dozen for the Standard Model), which is still two times the number of dimension this universe has.

But I think we'll get there eventually. The fact that you came up with this ideal model makes me hope that efforts will be made to reach this said model. May it be tomorrow or in a thousand years, we'll get there.


edit on 2-6-2014 by swanne because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 2 2014 @ 01:58 PM
link   
And to think, I sent them a donation. I feel cheated. There are ways to work around "zero citations," and it is a shame that Wikipedia has such anal nerds running its website these days. There was another post that they deleted very important information regarding the topic, and you could tell the people removing it had a bias towards its deletion. It really is shameful that even wikipedia has been corrupted with politics. Time to make a new free encyclopedia.



posted on Jun, 2 2014 @ 03:14 PM
link   
a reply to: swanne

Is string theory a kind of preon model? Or at least having in common, the suggestion that there are smaller fundamentalities of quanta then the standard models fundamental particles?



posted on Jun, 5 2014 @ 04:19 AM
link   
a reply to: ImaFungi

No, string theory still assume that quarks are not composite particles. It simply states that instead of being points, all particles are strings.

Preons are rejected by almost every authorities on physics.





new topics

top topics
 
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join