posted on Jun, 1 2014 @ 10:48 PM
a reply to: MysterX
Just to go a little Off topic.
I thought That was hillarious when Joan Collins turned into a sweaty football player after being given a chocolate bar, it's a bit sad that the
advert's are sometimes better than the rubbish they put on telly these day's.
Anyway I am not infallible so like the debate this subject can cause, I am open to change my opinion if convinced sufficiantly but do indeed believe
there is a large amount of evidence to show obfuscation such as air brushing was used on many photographs of the moon though the reasons need not be
what I believe and as this was during the cold war a number of classified applications, possible military project's and other matter's could also give
a valid reason for such image tampering.
In my very strong opinion though as there are images in which the hasselblad lens etching sometime's pass behind the object's on the image
(Indicating the object was cut and pasted) there is more than sufficiant evident something was being hidden from the public.
May years ago I also heard of classified militar archaeological excavations here on earth, sadly we are so prevalent on the surface today that it
would be almost impossible to identify any traces where we have habited from before our current or nearer past occupation of those area's, think on
the problem a worker faces, he is digging a trench to lay concrete piping for cable or sewrage use but comes across a buried car that is in a very bad
state of decay, now doese he stop to see if this a 40000 year old car or does he simply dig up the MODERN junk and lay his cable while swearing at the
idiot whom left or buried it there.
Now I happen to believe we did go to the moon (Not me of course but a bunch of american guy's in an aluminium can).
but this is worth looking at for any number of reasons as it goes over many problems with nasa images from the period only some of which can be
My argument for how they survived the van allen belt's is that the radiation may be sparse and perhaps the solar emissions were low at that period
but I am not qualified or in possession of any data to quantify that idea (Not theory).
These have probably been discussed elsewere but if not deserve a thread all of there own.
edit on 1-6-2014 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason