It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: KawRider9
And that quote right there is why we get upset with people like you. You don't know squat about guns, but you have the nerve to tell us what we should or shouldn't own
originally posted by: khnum
a reply to: skeptikal1
How many assault weapons did it take to overthrow Egypt or the Ukraine?
the power lies with people not guns,if the whole country didn't show up for work they'd give you whatever you want,this is my last post on this thread Im wasting my time on it.
originally posted by: voyger2
I have no agenda, just an opinion that I wanted to share after seeing that father's outcry.
The gun defenders on the other hand, have what you guys call an agenda I believe. Cause after this thread started to shake established beliefs (the majority at least) threads like these one www.abovetopsecret.com... just popped like corn. One should ask why?
People should be able to detach from objects that are designed to kill at far distance and at incredible rate.
Maybe is time to fight against the cloud of fear that rules your lives. Maybe having Guns at will is not the solution but the problem. You have lived until now in that kind if way and all you have raised is fear, paranoia, terrorism/mass shooting and strict regulations at schools, hospitals, public places etc... Maybe you should give it a try.
Fight for freedom. fight for the freedom to walk the street's with out fear.
People shouldn't be able to walk with guns on the street's.
As always, there could be exceptions,
At isolated places, for example, with big propriety's to take care, there owners should have a licence to carry ONE gun, and there could be more examples that should be taken in consideration at proper debate time.
But, taking guns of streets that should be big issue for debate and for change. people should think on that instead of throwing rocks at me.
originally posted by: TDawgRex
a reply to: voyger2
Personally, (..) for the Father(..) I see him dancing on the grve of his son promoting his own personal agenda. I just don't care about him anymore,
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
You mean being "allowed" to exercise the Constitutional Right should be "an exception?" This solidifies my belief that you're uninformed on what freedom is.