It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I guess paying the penalty to let the workers get their own isn't much of an option anymore. Not for the large employers that fall within the guidelines. Wait.. There is more, I'm afraid.
Am I missing the downside to this? I don't see one.
originally posted by: Th1nker
Mayby Obama was right when he said going on the ACA would save you $2500... He is making it so employer supplied health insurance will go up by that much or more...
originally posted by: nugget1
The noose keeps getting tighter! How is this acceptable?
I remember a time when other countries used to envy Americans, and their freedom. Now, they pity us.
originally posted by: links234
Am I missing the downside to this? I don't see one.
Having said that, I think we'd be better off with a single-payer system.
and your assertion that if you can provide a service or product for sufficient profit you would already be doing so doesn't work because it can take huge sums of money to start a business capable of competing with the giants that already exist
its ridiculous to think in this day and age that anyone with the abilities to compete also has opportunity to do so
originally posted by: tmeister182
This is what comes of voting in laws without knowing what is inside them. The shame is on us for voting these lazy,sneaky,self-serving people into office and then allowing them to stay there and fleece our wealth right out from under us.