posted on Nov, 30 2004 @ 02:55 PM
As a non lethal weapon,full proof...maybe you have a point,but there have been atleast 70 deaths from this thing,and the part where you mention that
the 'assailant' might have asked for it through his or her actions..well that's not completely true in ALL the cases.Tell me what a nine year old
girl who had been handcuffed already and possed no threats and still got the shock of her life..justifies your reasoning in the matter..
When I was in Canada in 88' we were involved in a car accident that had already happend,we just brushed one of the cars and kept going,but a flat
tier needed repairing so we pulled out on the next exit.It was late at night so it was dark,I had the croos in my hand to loosen the flat tier's
bolts,but in a flash some seven police cars appeared from out of the blue and they all were pointing their guns at me.They thought we caused the
accident and made a run for it.We could'nt stick around because the driver had already a DUI to his name...One wrong move from me whit that wrench in
my hands and a slightly trigger jitter and we would'nt be talikng about it now....
So do i prefer a stun gun yes!!! do i want to be shot at with it for stepping out of a car that might have exceeded the speed limit..Catagorically