a reply to: Vovin
And I'm calling you a racist bigot because you said Khadr was a "child molester" who should have been killed like the rest.
as i said, you need to work on your reading comprehension skills.
here are my words.
aww, the then under age juvenile delinquent canadian citizen, that wanted to play the like he was a warrior for a god
a child molester made up while hold up in a cave under a rock is getting sued for killing and wounding U.S. Service Men.
to make it simple for those who may lack skills, i put what i said about the under age juvenile delinquent canadian citizen, in lime green,
and the prophet mohamed in red. i guess i should have put a comma and the word that in between warrior and the a, for those that can't comprehend. i
kinda thought everyone knew that mohamed was under the rock when he wrote the quran, and was a prevert that married a six year old girl and had sex
with her when she was nine. i guess that the old saying that when you assume, you make a a@@ out of you and me can go both ways.
now a couple of questions.
1. where did i say he was a child molester? did i not say a warrior for a god? the then under age juvenile delinquent canadian
citizen, that wanted to play the like he was a warrior for a god
2. do you deny mohamed married a six year old girl and when she was nine had sex with her? married or not and even in that day in time i call sex
with a nine year old a child molester.
3. when did being a muslim, turn into a race? as i said in my first reply to you there are people of many races and ethnicity that are muslim. not
all muslims are of middle eastern descent and i never once said any thing about a race. i said a juvenile delinquent canadian citizen, and child
molester made up. never once mentioning race and or ethnicity. stop trying to use that word if you don't know what it means, or can't win your
argument without trying to use political correctness to cloud a issuse.
all i said about khadr, was he wanted to play the warrior for a god role.
now for the other parts,
And you claim he was charged with war crimes? Buddy, if you think war crimes are the enemy killing your soldier in combat, then you have no clue what
"war crimes" are. The whole Invasion of Afghanistan was a war crime. It was carried out on false pretences and had nothing to do with 9/11.
your wrong about this. no matter who you think planned, instigated, and executed 9/11, there is no doubt that members of al-qaeda were
this should give you a indication of my views on 9/11, i shouldn't have to spell it out for you.
now lets just use a little common sense, say you were young teen living in a modern liberal society, such as canada, where many of the people are.
would you go to a country where the majority were, blood thirsty, intolerant male chauvinists, that have backwards ways of thinking, such as the
taliban are. that went/goes around their country, murdering, torturing, and belittling those that don't hold to their views, and fight for them. no
matter what your father thinks or believes or where he takes you. at 14, 15 yrs old, you have your own mind, and can make declensions about things on
your own. i know i butted heads with my pop when i was that age. went a totally different way than what he said.
i could go on about the rest of your post but i'm afraid your comprehension skills wouldn't allow you to understand.
but i will say this about the ICC.
as far as the ICC the main reason for the U.S. not recognizing it. my understanding of it is because it conflicts with the with the U.S. Constitution
supremacy clause. to put it simply, the Rome Statute/ ICC would override some U.S. laws which is not a good thing.
opinions vary on this, many think in order for the U.S. to recognize the Rome Statute/ ICC, there would have to be amendments added to the US
Constitution, much in the same way ireland did.
but i guess if you are a worlder, giving up your laws to suit the rest of the world is just fine.
oh, you have no idea of who i am, and how much i know about war.