Originally posted by dribbler
I feel there is ample evidence to prove that John Titor is a Mason. He makes several references to the society in his journal.
What journal? The only 'authentic' titor text is the stuff that came out of his irq chats. I know that there was a book published later on by the
'John Titor' Foundation, supposedly written or edited by his 'mom' because he's like 8 years old or whatever, but why accept that as
'cannonical'?
superstring
You people do realize that Titor does not exist..right?
I should hope everyone realizes that he does. I do have to admit that it was a darned good 'event' tho, kind of like 'dinner theatre' or an
online 'murder-mystery group participation event'. However, now that its already past the time that the his 'history' should have occurred, the
people that created the hoax should admit it, hell take credit for it even.
tesla
There will not be any "North and South"with this one
In the Titor story (of course lifted from that fictionary future history book) it was cities versus countryside.
[quote\He may have been a Mason
I don't think that anyone has presented anything supporting the idea that he is a mason.
I would have to say that John Titor cannot be a mason. Its entirely contrary to the 'radical right wing militia' or 'survivalist' ideology.
These kind of people are anti-masons, heck they're probably the exact sort of people who made up the old third party, the Anti-Masonic League.
They're very much against secrecy, and 'influence' and anti-federal, and probably see freemasons as part of the problem rather than part of the
solution.