Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed

originally posted by: buddha
One Very destinked thing about a Nuc is Electromagnetic pulse!
the police fire and ambulance radios would not work.
at the very least the radios would squeal.
And all the TV cameras.

or have they made a Nuc with no EMP?

Yet, most people believe the official story despite the fact that the government made it obvious not only that the buildings collapsed from controlled demolition, but also that the evidence for this was obviously left behind on purpose.
Even conspiracy theorists have a hard time with this obvious fact.
They leave behind the evidence on purpose, they make it obvious that they left behind the evidence on purpose, AND MOST PEOPLE STILL BELIEVE THE OFFICIAL STORY.
Millions and millions. A tidal wave of voices. All of which use sound bites as their opinion
This is all talk and no results. they can control the masses this way.
Example....
A debate that will rage on forever with hardly any change happening.

a reply to: madenusa

Would you like to cite your ten most credible items that indicate CD?

Let's count the evidence against nuke devices....

One: no evidence of blasts that resulted in over pressure events, or enough sound energy, that indicates enough energy was released in the form of a shock wave to cut steel columns. No windows blown out?

Two: no deaths on 9/11, or after, from radiation poisoning or burns.

Three: no proof of individuals with radiation burns.

Four: no evidence of an electromagnetic disturbance that would have created noise in WTC broadcasts and video recodings.

Five: no evidence of metals activated by radiation at the WTC.

Six: no spreading of contamination by first responders or WTC clean up crews to hospitals, equipment, homes, resultants, fire stations that would indicate radiation contamination/levels that would cause cancer.

Seven: no proof of any radiation above background period. No proof of contamination with radiation above background.

Eight, no proof of abnormal ratios of radioactive isotopes that would be evidence of a nuclear reaction.

The truth movement has a theory of a super secret nuke weapon that produces no measurable radiation above background, but release enough radiation/ contamination to produce abnormal cancer rates?

If the bomb was detonated in the basement, then the building would have fell bottom up. Or a ripple up the building. Or a simultaneous drop in all floors.

If the bomb was detonated at the site of jet impact, how was the vertical columns and walls pulled inward? No windows blown outward?

the-pre-collapse-inward-bowing-of-wtc2.t4760/
www.metabunk.org...

a reply to: madenusa

False narrative. False argument. People do not believe in the pseudoscience of the truth movement. The lies of the truth movement has little to do with believing in the "offical narrative".

The remains of the world trade center towers had the highest levels of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins ever recorded in the US.
If you have ever heard of agent orange the toxic agent in agent orange was Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin .

The polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins came from burning PCBs used as fire retardant used in the electricial wiring. transformers and other materials used in the trade towers.

disorders caused by dioxin.

AL Amyloidosis
A rare disease caused when an abnormal protein, amyloid, enters tissues or organs
Chronic B-cell Leukemias
A type of cancer which affects white blood cells
Chloracne (or similar acneform disease)
A skin condition that occurs soon after exposure to chemicals and looks like common forms of acne seen in teenagers. Under VA's rating regulations, it must be at least 10 percent disabling within one year of exposure to herbicides.
Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
A disease characterized by high blood sugar levels resulting from the body’s inability to respond properly to the hormone insulin
Hodgkin's Disease
A malignant lymphoma (cancer) characterized by progressive enlargement of the lymph nodes, liver, and spleen, and by progressive anemia
Ischemic Heart Disease
A disease characterized by a reduced supply of blood to the heart, that leads to chest pain
Multiple Myeloma
A cancer of plasma cells, a type of white blood cell in bone marrow
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
A group of cancers that affect the lymph glands and other lymphatic tissue
Parkinson's Disease
A progressive disorder of the nervous system that affects muscle movement
Peripheral Neuropathy, Early-Onset
A nervous system condition that causes numbness, tingling, and motor weakness. Under VA's rating regulations, it must be at least 10 percent disabling within one year of herbicide exposure.
Porphyria Cutanea Tarda
A disorder characterized by liver dysfunction and by thinning and blistering of the skin in sun-exposed areas. Under VA's rating regulations, it must be at least 10 percent disabling within one year of exposure to herbicides.
Prostate Cancer
Cancer of the prostate; one of the most common cancers among men
Respiratory Cancers (includes lung cancer)
Cancers of the lung, larynx, trachea, and bronchus
Soft Tissue Sarcomas (other than osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Kaposi's sarcoma, or mesothelioma)
A group of different types of cancers in body tissues such as muscle, fat, blood and lymph vessels, and connective tissues


I was exposed to polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins do to a fire on a navy ship off vietnam and have been trying to get service connected disability.

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: madenusa

Would you like to cite your ten most credible items that indicate CD?

It was a horrendous fire but The building structure would still be there.
A steel-framed high-rise building has never completely collapsed from fire,And yet three buildings supposedly collapsed in this manner, one of which wasn’t even hit by a plane.

You don’t need further proof, you don’t need to ask yourself “how did it get there?” or “how did they do it?” – you only need to look at the way the buildings collapsed! In free fall, symmetric….
Fact: It is impossible for any structure to fall within it’s own footprint without controlled demolition.
Fact: On one day three buildings did the impossible.
Fact: No high rise structure in history, including some that burned for weeks, ever collapsed from fire.
Fact: On one day three buildings did what had never happened before

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: madenusa

False narrative. False argument. People do not believe in the pseudoscience of the truth movement. The lies of the truth movement has little to do with believing in the "offical narrative".

All three structures fell in there own foot print... Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001?

a reply to: madenusa

Towers fell in their own footprints? Let's start with that. The WTC tower attacks destroyed, or damaged buildings beyond the ability to safely repair them, at least ten other buildings. Is that false?

So? Never done before makes it impossible. Let's go with the false CD theories. The towers would be the first CD of a high rise building using explosives over 47 floors.

The towers would have been the first successful top down demolition of high rise buildings.

If you want to go with thermite, the towers would have been the first CD of high rise buildings using thermite.

To believe the truth movement. The first ever successful CD of a building over 47 floors, by the first ever top down CD of a high rise building, by the first successful use of slow burning and inconsistent timed thermite on a high rise building was carried out twice on one day. For the first time.

The truth movement claims the resistance of each floor had to be removed to achieve the whiteness collapse speed.

So a complex and sophisticated floor to floor detonation system survived impacts that cut elevator cables and fire water mains, in addition to multi floor fires, to carry out all those firsts of the CD world. All with no evidence of an over pressure event, demolitions shrapnel, audible explosions indicative of a shock wave capable of cutting steel. Or no flashing of explosives or thermite setting off. For thermite, no sparking of thermite cutting steel.

With no attempt By you to explain the inward bowing of vertical columns as seen in the video in this thread? That lead to collapse.

the-pre-collapse-inward-bowing-of-wtc2.t4760/
www.metabunk.org...

a reply to: madenusa


tehran-plasco-highrise-fire-and-collapse-9-11-wtc7-wtc1-2-comparisons.t8338/

www.metabunk.org...

a reply to: madenusa

By the way, architects and engineers 9/11 truth now claims other builds were damage by the ejection of material from explosives beyond the footprints of the towers. So you are using an argument abandoned by the truth movement long ago.

result of social engineering....... youtu.be... control both sides by creating an artificial war that hides away the main issue
Millions and millions. A tidal wave of voices.
All of which use sound bites as their opinion
This is all talk and no results. they can control the masses this way.
Example....
A debate that will rage on forever with hardly any change happening.

a reply to: madenusa

No, this is about the inconsistent theories of the truth movement. That the towers did not fall at free fall speed. The towers did not fall in their own footprints. The vertical columns were not cut, and the vertical columns were left standing for seconds after the floors of the towers completed collapsed.

Your inability to give the cause of collapse citing actual video.

And your inability to create a coherent theory on what brought down the towers.

The towers were improperly fire proofed as outlined in pre 9/11 inspections.

The towers used less concrete than normal high rise buildings to minimize costs.

The towers were abnormal in their design of long floor trusses with no additional supports along the lengths of the trusses.

The towers lost sprinkle systems because of the jet impacts.

The fires initiated by the jet fuel spread at rates faster than designers anticipated.

These factors lead to the destruction of the towers. Along with:

Steel weakened by 60 percent to resist load.

The steel trusses tried to expand when heated. The columns prevented the steel trusses growing in length, so the steel trusses drooped.

Once the trusses cooled, they contacted. Pulling in the outer columns until they buckeled.

The portion of the towers above the buckling slammed into the remaining building below. The falling mass broke the floor connections and stared the snowball effect and growing mass of collapsing floors.

The examination of the WTC ruble showed floor connections were overloaded and sheared. Not cut and burnt by explosives.

Once all the floors of the towers collapsed, the core and outer vertical columns were left standing for whole seconds. The columns were the last items to collapse.

Please stop enabling groups like AE 9/11 Truth, and individuals like Dr Wood dustification, to exploit 9/11 for book sales, donations, and making a living selling a commercial product based on what their focus group wants to hear. Arguments based on half truth, misquotes, quotes out of context, and right out lies.

a reply to: madenusa

Has nothing to do with social engineering.

It has everything to do with conspiracists exploiting 9/11 for profit and notoriety.

The US government covering up it was asleep on 9/11.

The US immigration system and political favors for Middle East interests allowed the terrorists in.

The false narrative about guys in caves pulling off 9/11. The truth that very rich and powerful Middle Eastern interests funded the terrorists, pulled strings, and called in favors to get them into the USA. All to advance the cult of jihad.

No one mentions the ten thousand boxes of det cord connectors in the building for two months prior

originally posted by: GBP/JPY
No one mentions the ten thousand boxes of det cord connectors in the building for two months prior

What does false reports of det cord have to do with actual inward bowing and outer vertical columns buckling. And with no sign, no sound, no flashes, no sparking, no proof of an over pressure event, no proof of shrapnel created from the detonation of explosives. And how would a system of det cord survive jet impacts and wide spread fires.

a reply to: neutronflux

And how would a system of det cord survive jet impacts and wide spread fires.

You won't get a coherent explanation.
911 is a religion for some. All faith based.
Truth and facts have no effect on faith based theories.

I'm not sure how it would used....the demo connectors....actually, I enhanced by calling them det cord connectors

I thought of it when I read in between the deck metal pan ribs.......where they cross the joists, which btw....droop or whale belly....we call it, about 6 inches some of them.....in Dallas high rises anyway....

So a ton of connectors for wiring the under deck....you could call it, you know....pull the ceiling tiles and four feet up there are the deck pan ribs.....hidden way up there in the spider webs and MONOCOTE....what we call it

That could maybe blow the crap out of the floors,,,maybe
I'm curious about what did they do with so many cases of connectors.....and four months in front of the event.....hmm
Just now hit me....oh, and one more thing you could explain for me.......Colombo.....gigglegiggle

a reply to: GBP/JPY

In addition to you not being able to explain how a complex det cord system survived the jet impacts and wide spread fires all the way to the lobbies that cut elevator cables, elevator service, firewater mains / headers, fire water service, and other utilities.

One, any proof the work took place? Any documentation of work on all floors? If it took the impossibly short time to det cord each floor in two nights, it would take over 200 days to rig one tower.

Two, who installed all that det cord?

Three, if a demolition circuit is set up. Something like radar from aircraft can induce enough current / electrical potential to prematurely set the det cord off.

Four, all inspections by all parties show the floor connections were overloaded. Not worked on or burnt by explosives.

Five, if det cord is wrapped to create enough explosive force to cut steel, then it would produce an audible noise. An audible sound is the result of a pressure wave powerful enough to cut steel.

Six, if your idea was even possible, then AE 9/11 Truth would not have created the fizzle no flash explosives theory. Det cord flashes when set off.

Seven, AE Truth ignoring the basic physics of large items colliding will produce changes in direction like billiard balls, claims only explosives could cause lateral ejection from the towers. Something like det cord would not do.

Eight, still no proof of shrapnel created by chemical explosives blowing apart steel connections.

Nine, let's go with the low figure of 2000 feet of det cord per floor. That comes out to 41 miles of det cord per tower.

Ten, you have created a false narrative. The upper portion of each tower actually fell do to vertical columns buckling and giving. The upper 12 floors of one tower, and 29 floors for the other tower. Video evidence shows the whole upper part of the towers falling down. All the floors and all the vertical columns fell simultaneously down as a unit. Your det cord theory doesn't explain what actually happened.

a reply to: madenusa

It was a horrendous fire but The building structure would still be there. A steel-framed high-rise building has never completely collapsed from fire,And yet three buildings supposedly collapsed in this manner, one of which wasn’t even hit by a plane.

I was going to post a video of a parrot as a response to this.

You don’t need further proof, you don’t need to ask yourself “how did it get there?” or “how did they do it?” – you only need to look at the way the buildings collapsed! In free fall, symmetric…. Fact: It is impossible for any structure to fall within it’s own footprint without controlled demolition.

Free fall, fall with in its own footprint.

and that is proof of something to do with the twin towers, FACT: they didn't fall into their own foot print and didn't fall a free fall speed.

Fact: On one day three buildings did the impossible.

Which was?

Fact: No high rise structure in history, including some that burned for weeks, ever collapsed from fire.

Did the Twin towers?

Fact: On one day three buildings did what had never happened before

another fact about 3 buildings, yet you mention any facts or what the 3 buildings did, like the other fact about 3 buildings.

All three structures fell in there own foot print...

No they didn't.

I suggest you watch some videos of after the collapses.