posted on May, 20 2014 @ 06:28 PM
originally posted by: gladtobehere
a reply to: tothetenthpower
Or maybe they were saving it as a kind of trump card to reveal at the proper time.
With the appointment of Joe Biden's son to the Ukrainian gas company, Burisma, the US and the globalists have made it clear that they are serious
about occupying Ukraine.
All too often these international "conflicts" are theater for the masses but this one seems legit.
This also gives credibility to the mini-nuke theory.
It adds to the credibility only if it is true. As I said in my very first post here, there are some passages in the VT telling of the story that I
know are irrelevant and incorrect and have no relation as to whether a nuke was used or not, and I still fail to see why the use of those passages
were needed unless they are part of the original source narrative.
If they were IMHO, the story is bull, If the VT writer added them in, then
he shot himself in the foot.
To make my position clear about 9/11, it will smell until the day I die. I don't much care what anybody else may think otherwise.
So, what about the nukes as being planted underneath the towers, the essence of the story? Well, we do know from the days of decent reporting that in
fact there were 80+suitcase 1 kiloton nuclear devices missing since the 1990's and they were in fact, Russian. The method then, would suit perfectly,
but not the output. It seems the US had something similar, perhaps more powerful, I know nothing about them.
Who has all this stuff? somebody must have, and what's going on with the decommissioning of nuclear warheads in the US as of now? all those generals
kicked out, WTF was going on there? none of them were kicked out for incompetence per se. Some were supposed to be doing a bit of groping, or cheating
at the table..crazy stuff.