posted on May, 20 2014 @ 08:42 PM
My guess is a South American country, although a European country might make sense as well. Someone mentioned Puerto Rico, but they said country, and
Puerto Rico is considered by most people to be a part of the US. I just don't know if they would have worded it that way, although I it is its own
country, or territory. I had a friend in the air force who was from Puerto Rico, and he told me some pretty crazy stuff, although I don't know if any
of it was true. His accent was difficult to understand as well, lol.
But ya, I think it would relate to drug countries. And I think that given the tension with certain South American countries at the moment, this could
really make someone upset. Obviously if not one of these countries, then it would likely be a developed country, and not a less technologically
sophisticated place. And although I wouldn't put it past the NSA to record all communications from a major ally like Britain, I don't think they could
get away with it.
I mean think about this...The CIA operated Black Sites in European countries, but there was complicity among certain government officials, some of
whom have been punished by this time for their involvement. Supposedly these sites do not exist anymore, but I find that unlikely. They are usually
located strategically near airports, where specific civilian planes are often used by the CIA. There are also floating Black Sites, prison ships if
you will. Or at least there were before Obama supposedly outlawed these places. I have a feeling the CIA didn't comply fully however. They are their
own bosses when it comes to certain things.
My point is that if the monitoring is going on in a highly developed country with their own intelligence agencies that are fairly sophisticated, then
it is hard to think that they wouldn't be complicit in something like this. It would be hard to miss, as the infrastructure would need to be in place,
and it is hard to keep that secret in a foreign country, when that foreign country has their own sophisticated tech intel networks.
5/20/14 by JiggyPotamus because: (no reason given)
edit on 5/20/14 by JiggyPotamus because: (no reason given)