It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

HAARP the amazing weather manipulation tool you can run.

page: 1
9
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 18 2014 @ 03:30 PM
link   
Yes, ladies and gentleman, step right up, the price is right!

For the low, low price of $5 million dollars. (please use the Dr. Evil voice anytime you discuss money in the 'millions')




The University of Alaska has expressed interest in taking over the research site, which is off the Tok Cutoff in an area where black spruce was cleared a quarter-century ago for the Air Force backscatter radar project that was never completed. But the school has not volunteered to pay $5 million a year to run HAARP - See more at: www.abovetopsecret.com...


So, for those who are taken in by huckesters who are either not smart enough to understand English, or just like to lie to their sheep, either way, you can control the world. Muhahahahhhaha!


Yes, in light of the recent threads about HAARP being admittedly used for weather control, this thread is necessary. It does tie in with an idea I had to introduce the "L" word to all things chemtrail. But wait, what does HAARP have to do with chemtrails? I am glad you asked my friend. Nothing. Well, as much as it has to do with controlling the weather.

So, gather up those extra pennies. Pull your resources, call a friend. You may be able to play GOD!

Unless of course HAARP is only used to manipulate the Ionosphere, in which case it has nothing to do with weather. (disclaimer that will not be needed as nobody reads threads, just titles)




posted on May, 18 2014 @ 03:35 PM
link   
Is that all it costs?

For messing up the planets weather and causing quakes and whatever else this machine might do, thats cheap. Just 5 mil?



posted on May, 18 2014 @ 03:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Biigs

Well, it is 5 million a year. But what a deal!

And you can work along side young college students who also want to destroy the world!..... I mean, control the ionosphere.



posted on May, 18 2014 @ 03:46 PM
link   
Yearly operating cost only is what it costs to run at its current condition - developing new technology and new uses is probably not included in this price. The five million is just the cost to keep the facility open, that probably doesn't include staffing etc etc.

You'd be in a lot more than five million.



posted on May, 18 2014 @ 03:52 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude


Yes, in light of the recent threads about HAARP being admittedly used for weather control, this thread is necessary.

Oh, I thought it was just another haarp thread.



posted on May, 18 2014 @ 04:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: SolarZen
Yearly operating cost only is what it costs to run at its current condition - developing new technology and new uses is probably not included in this price. The five million is just the cost to keep the facility open, that probably doesn't include staffing etc etc.

You'd be in a lot more than five million.


But, who can put a price tag on controlling the worlds weather?

You could cause billions of dollars of damage with a hurricane, or an outbreak of tornadoes.

Then swoop in with your home improvement company and make bank.

Unless of course you find that HAARP is only for the ionosphere. Then you might look a bit foolish.



posted on May, 18 2014 @ 04:35 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

First thing is that it needs a name change, the last model didn't go down too well, you could call it, 'GUINNESS' aka,
Genuine Use of Inebriated Nut Nobblers ExceSS. That way you can hide what you are really doing.


edit on 18-5-2014 by smurfy because: Text.



posted on May, 18 2014 @ 06:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
Unless of course HAARP is only used to manipulate the Ionosphere, in which case it has nothing to do with weather. (disclaimer that will not be needed as nobody reads threads, just titles)



Radio waves carry news of climate change: Surprising tool to measure our changing climate
www.sciencedaily.com...


Global warming, upper atmospheric cooling
On Earth's surface and in the lower atmosphere, an increase of greenhouse gases has a warming effect, the gases acting as a "blanket" and keeping heat from escaping from Earth into space. But these gases, including carbon dioxide, are increasing in the upper atmosphere as well, where they have a cooling effect.
When cooled, the ionosphere contracts and descends into the atmosphere to where air is denser -- leading to a higher absorption of radio waves, Prof. Price explains. By examining satellite-gathered data on the temperature in the upper atmosphere and comparing results to measurements of radio wave amplitudes collected on the ground, the researchers were able to uncover a clear correlation, consistent over time. As the upper atmosphere gets colder, radio signals lose their strength.

. . .

Using this system might reveal more about the ionosphere than ever before. The region is notoriously difficult to monitor; there are no weather balloons or airplanes that can go high enough, and it is too low for orbiting satellites. But with this method, it could be possible to study long and short term changes in the ionosphere, such as the impact of solar storms or thunderstorms on the upper atmosphere.


Except we don't really know all that much about the ionosphere's impact on global climate or weather patterns other than a massive contraction might impact trade winds.

But we really just don't have that much info.

Thanks for sharing your opinion on a matter to which scientists admit knowledge concerning the topic of your OP is severely lacking.

I don't buy chemtrails, but I also don't buy into your clear overwhelming understanding of the ionosphere's impact on weather either.

tootles . . .

-FBB



posted on May, 18 2014 @ 06:32 PM
link   
This is what I was talking about in the "admission of weather control" thread yesterday. There is absolutely no way the government would relinquish such a powerful tool, which says that it is not so powerful. If it was powerful enough to unleash the Japanese tsunami at will, or whatever people believe, let's just let anyone play with it.



posted on May, 18 2014 @ 08:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: FriedBabelBroccoli
Except we don't really know all that much about the ionosphere's impact on global climate or weather patterns other than a massive contraction might impact trade winds.
But we really just don't have that much info.


we're pretty sure there is little or no effect from the ionosphere on weather at lower levels - but the
reverse is apparently true - weather at lower altitudes affects "space weather" in the ionosphere.

the ionosphere is simply far too empty to have enough energy to do much to the denser altitudes where our weather actually happens - however it does conduct electricity and contributes to lightening by being a conduit along which charges can travel.

Raising or lowering it a meter or 10 has little or no observed influence as far as I can see - it naturally rises and sinks several kilometers between day and night anyway.



posted on May, 18 2014 @ 08:06 PM
link   
Running a weather machine for a year; $5,000,000

Watching humans scatter like ants as you unleash a global apocalypse; priceless.

Hey, what's not to like about being the most evil person on the planet? Other than the fact that baddies always get vanquished?



posted on May, 18 2014 @ 08:42 PM
link   
a reply to: markosity1973

but but but....YOU are the baddie....



posted on May, 18 2014 @ 08:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
a reply to: markosity1973

but but but....YOU are the baddie....



Some days I think a lot of members would agree with that statement

*raises pinky finger to corner of mouth* Mwahahahahaha



posted on May, 19 2014 @ 05:33 AM
link   
a reply to: markosity1973

This is the next best thing, since you cannot have sharks with "laser" beams on their frickin heads.



posted on May, 19 2014 @ 12:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul

Raising or lowering it a meter or 10 has little or no observed influence as far as I can see - it naturally rises and sinks several kilometers between day and night anyway.



A meter or ten . . . ha! Your are silly.

It is largely a chemistry issue though.
www.swsc-journal.org...
a06-p5 & a06-p9
edit on 19-5-2014 by FriedBabelBroccoli because: 101



posted on May, 19 2014 @ 12:28 PM
link   
I wonder is electricity is included in the 5 mil a year running cost.

Shooting a billion watts of electromagnetic energy into the sky a few times a week or however often they do it, thats got to be quite the electric bill.



posted on May, 19 2014 @ 12:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Biigs

I am sorry. Only a free continental breakfast is included.
You will have to pay the light bill as well.

BUT! if you act today, you will also get a free set of Ginsu knives!



posted on May, 19 2014 @ 12:54 PM
link   
not worth it
edit on 19-5-2014 by network dude because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2014 @ 01:01 PM
link   
So, if I had $5m, should I cause a mag 9.9 earthquake in New York before or after I hit the city with 3 Cat5 hurricanes? And how many chmetrails do I need first? And where do you buy them from?

This is important, so serious answers only please



posted on May, 19 2014 @ 02:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: AndyMayhew
And how many chmetrails do I need first? And where do you buy them from?

This is important, so serious answers only please


Seriously? They are every damn where. Just look up man! I can only show you the information, you have to do your own homework. I mean, the sky never used to look like this. Ever.




top topics



 
9
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join