posted on Jun, 12 2014 @ 08:31 AM
a reply to: Utnapisjtim
Since my last post, I counted every 133 years (19x7) to try and find the other missing years, and now Im back to 1582. All AD dates before 1582 are
listed according to the Julian calendar, yet the vernal new moon didnt drift any further than 3/17. This indicates that nasa accounted for and
corrected the Julian error. When it comes to the placement of the Vernal Equinox on the data sheet, the Gregorian and Julian calendars reflect almost
the same data.
As I went through history, 133 years at a time, I noticed a very gradual shift, but that shift doesnt explain why all dates after 1582 seem to be
staggered by 2 years. Its not a matter of metonic or equinoctal drift, because as stated, all years on the listing seem to have been intercalated.
My only conclusion is that Gregory must have used his 10 omission to cover a larger two year omission.
Ill have to check the BC metonic cycles, and see how correct they are, but by process of elimination using the Mayan calendar, Paleo-hebrew meter, and
the metonic cycle, all indications are that history has been tampered with.