Michelle Obama's #BringBackOurGirls photo...My take

page: 1
12

log in

join

posted on May, 17 2014 @ 08:06 PM
link   
Here's my take on Michelle Obama's #BringBackOurGirls photo.





posted on May, 17 2014 @ 08:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: RocksFromSpace
Here's my take on Michelle Obama's #BringBackOurGirls photo.



That cockeyed Michelle's sign should've read this, instead:

"I wasn't talking to you, I was talking to that squirrel over there"



posted on May, 17 2014 @ 08:23 PM
link   
a reply to: RocksFromSpace

#ImMarriedToAnIdiot

OPINION: Credible.
.
edit on 17-5-2014 by FarleyWayne because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 17 2014 @ 08:29 PM
link   
Pretty harsh and really unnecessary, but the overall point that a Twitter Hash tag and, indeed, anything related to Twitter, is a substitute for international diplomacy is abhorrent. Unfortunately, it's a great symbol for the shallowness of the administration's foreign policy naivete that makes it the laughingstock of the world. #Bringbackourgirls is an abomination, really, an embarrassment that makes me ashamed. But I'm not impressed with the OP either. It's just as pathetic.



posted on May, 17 2014 @ 08:36 PM
link   
a reply to: weavty1

The look on her face is priceless. It reads like she's not really behind this one.

Just my take.



posted on May, 17 2014 @ 09:11 PM
link   
I am just going to continue to ask,

'"Who, exactly, is she supposedly talking to? She is married to the one person who affect any kind of 'bring back'."

That is all.

edit on 17-5-2014 by Libertygal because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 17 2014 @ 09:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Libertygal

I don't think she is really talking to anyone. I think what she is doing, is trying to get the public to perceive her as empathetic, and "just one of us".

I also don't think it worked out as well as her handlers thought it might.



posted on May, 17 2014 @ 10:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Kangaruex4Ewe

I know. I agree.


It was more of a rhetorical question, perhaps a mental exercise for those who didn't give much thought to it, or perhaps even bought into the attempted perception they tried to give.

Maybe make some think twice, I don't know.

But, I knew you would get it! Heheh.


(post by yamammasamonkey removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)

posted on May, 17 2014 @ 10:11 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on May, 17 2014 @ 10:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Libertygal
a reply to: Kangaruex4Ewe

I know. I agree.


It was more of a rhetorical question, perhaps a mental exercise for those who didn't give much thought to it, or perhaps even bought into the attempted perception they tried to give.

Maybe make some think twice, I don't know.

But, I knew you would get it! Heheh.




We would probably be surprised at how many folks won't think twice regardless. They'll just lap it up like the rest of the general public. It's good to see a few people do though.



posted on May, 17 2014 @ 10:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: yamammasamonkey

post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions





Well...I guess that proves you're not blind. Your challenges are different!



posted on May, 17 2014 @ 10:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: minkmouse

originally posted by: yamammasamonkey

post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions





Well...I guess that proves you're not blind. Your challenges are different!


They are indeed different... and disgusting.



posted on May, 17 2014 @ 11:07 PM
link   
a reply to: schuyler

I would really like to know how this is harsh. They deserve the ridicule. Obviously the girls are safe now, so why not throw it back in their face.





top topics
 
12

log in

join