It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Who assumes it doesn't do anything? The solar wind is plasma. It carries shreds of the Sun's magnetic field with it. It creates geomagnetic storms. It creates the aurora. It does lots of interesting things when it encounters the magnetic field produced by Earth.
We know there is plasma in space. It is ridiculous to assume that it doesn't do anything.
Of course Birkeland currents do something, since you can see their effects in the Aurora Borealis and Australis:
originally posted by: Mary Rose
There is a better explanation: Electric currents, also called Birkeland currents, in space. We know there is plasma in space. It is ridiculous to assume that it doesn't do anything.
Small scale variations in the upward current sheets (downward flowing electrons) accelerate magnetospheric electrons which, when they reach the upper atmosphere, create the Aurora Borealis and Australis.
Although observations point to the neutrality and lack of currents on large scales in the universe, many mechanisms are known that can generate charges or currents during the early universe. We examine the question of survivability of relic charges and currents in a realistic model of the universe. We show that the dynamics of cosmological perturbations drive the universe to become electrically neutral and current-free to a high degree of accuracy on all scales, regardless of initial conditions. We find that charges are efficiently driven away in a time small compared to the Hubble time for temperatures 100 GeV > T > 1 eV, while the same is true for currents at all temperatures T > 1 eV.
Did you read your source? It says it's considered outside anything even plausible by mainstream science!
originally posted by: th3ory
Actually, plasma cosmology deals with this and it says that it plays an important role far beyond our solar system.
Plasma Cosmology Wikipedia
many of the issues that were mysterious in the 1980s and 1990s, including discrepancies relating to the cosmic microwave background and the nature of quasars, have been solved with more evidence that, in detail, provides a distance and time scale for the universe. Plasma cosmology supporters therefore dispute the interpretations of evidence for the Big Bang, the time evolution of the cosmos, and even the expanding universe; their proposals are essentially outside anything considered even plausible in mainstream astrophysics and cosmology.
Space plasma is a serious topic, but you have to check to see if what people are saying about it are supported by observation. There are some fringe claims about it not supported by any observation, but then there are some mainstream claims well supported by observation.
The boundary between the Earth's magnetic field and interplanetary space was studied by Explorer 10. Future space craft would travel outside Earth orbit and study the composition and structure of the solar wind in much greater detail. These include WIND (spacecraft), (1994), Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE), Ulysses, the Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) in 2008, and Solar Probe+. Other spacecraft would study the sun, such as STEREO and Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO).
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Mary Rose
Who assumes it doesn't do anything? The solar wind is plasma. It carries shreds of the Sun's magnetic field with it. It creates geomagnetic storms. It creates the aurora. It does lots of interesting things when it encounters the magnetic field produced by Earth.
We know there is plasma in space. It is ridiculous to assume that it doesn't do anything.
"As neither double layer nor circuit can be derived from magnetofluid models of a plasma, such models are useless for treating energy transfer by means of double layers. They must be replaced by particle models and circuit theory."
...
"M. Azar has studied how a number of the most used textbooks in astrophysics treat important concepts like double layers, critical velocity, pinch effects and circuits. He has found that students using these textbooks remain essentially ignorant of even the existence of these, in spite of the fact that some of them have been well known for half a century [e.g., double layers and pinch effect]. The conclusion is that astrophysics is too important to be left in the hands of the astrophysicists. The billion-dollar telescope data must be treated by scientists who are familiar with laboratory and magnetospheric physics and circuit theory, and of course with modem plasma theory."
...
"I thought that the frozen-in concept [MHD theory] was very good from a pedagogical point of view, and indeed it became very popular. In reality, however, it was not a good pedagogical concept but a dangerous "pseudo-pedagogical concept." By pseudo-pedagogical I mean a concept which makes you believe that you understand a phenomenon whereas in reality you have drastically misunderstood it."