It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sep
And what exactly would you do after this air and sea attack? Where exactly are you planning to hit? There was an article several days ago that said that there are approximatly 350 sites that needs to be hit in order to stop Iran's nuclear program. Now here is my question. Lets just imagine you know where all the centrifuges are. Would Iran just sit back and take all this. What would the S-300s do? What would the FM 90s do? does they US know where all these SAMs are? Does the US know where all the missile launchers are? Does the US know the location of every single iranian cruise missile? Does the US know where all Iranian Shahabs, scuds and the other small missiles that they have been building for 20 years are? And if US strikes Iran what would the Iraqis do? Remember their most influencial leader is Iranian and his accent when he speacks Arabic is Persian. What would Hebolla and Hamas do? What would Fatah do? There is alot of things that have to be taken under close examination before the planees take off.
Originally posted by Murcielago
"Hebolla, Hamas, Fatah" This isn't a freaken Holy War.
As for the supposed 350 sites..... So? 1 B-2 Bomber could take them all out with 5 trips. But then with the help of F-117's and dozens of cruise missiles that number wouldn't be a problem.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Bless your heart, Sweat, I wouldn't expect you to realize when I'm right or when you're wrong. Don't worry, if you are ever in question, just ask me. I'm here for you, buddy. Always know that I have the facts (which makes me right) and they are only a u2u away.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to read a book. You know, those things that hold knowledge between the covers?
Originally posted by Murcielago
If we use Cruise missile and Stealth Bombers (F-117 & B-2) then what do Surface to Air missiles matter? they dont.
We know where there stationary military sites are, and that includes launching platforms and nuclear sites, so those would be on the top of the list. Navy ships in the Persian would be launching the cruise missile while stealth bombers would be taking off from Iraq, making there trips short, so they will be able to do several missions the first night. Basiaclly put up a "missile shield" on the Iraq & Iran borber, by using whatever means necessary whether it be by Pac-3 or ABL. As for some hidden sites I'm sure US Spy Sats have confirmed nearly all of them.
"Hebolla, Hamas, Fatah" This isn't a freaken Holy War.
As for the supposed 350 sites..... So? 1 B-2 Bomber could take them all out with 5 trips. But then with the help of F-117's and dozens of cruise missiles that number wouldn't be a problem.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Bless your heart, Sweat, I wouldn't expect you to realize when I'm right or when you're wrong. Don't worry, if you are ever in question, just ask me. I'm here for you, buddy. Always know that I have the facts (which makes me right) and they are only a u2u away.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to read a book. You know, those things that hold knowledge between the covers?
Originally posted by Sep
The navy ships in the gulf you mentioned will be shooting cruise missiles. What about the Iranian anti-ship missiles. What about the Sunburns? Are they just going to sit there?
The last Gulf War the US was not able to spot even one Scud launcher. How further has the US satilites adanved since then? As for the missile shields, there are no use against the Shahab, they might be able to stop Scuds, but the shahabs are far more adavance.
Sep
The navy ships in the gulf you mentioned will be shooting cruise missiles. What about the Iranian anti-ship missiles. What about the Sunburns? Are they just going to sit there?
Sep
The last Gulf War the US was not able to spot even one Scud launcher. How further has the US satilites adanved since then?
Sep
As for the missile shields, there are no use against the Shahab, they might be able to stop Scuds, but the shahabs are far more adavance.
Are you referring to Operation Iraqi Freedom? If so, Its because there wern't any, The US didn't relize that they still were weak from our last attack on them.
Originally posted by edsinger
As for the shahab being more advanced than the SCUD, you have no clue about which you speak let alone the technology.
Originally posted by Murcielago
The Navy Ships that would be in the persian have very powerful radars, and would see the sunburn coming, and there for would not make it a very formatable weapon.
Originally posted by edsinger
SUNBURN - Well again a Standard MKIIIER can get it, you dont think we would put a $8 billion dollar ship in range if we did not have a way to defend it do you? Phanlax is actually being phased out as it is to slow to react to modern threats. RAM isnt.
[edit on 2-12-2004 by edsinger]
Originally posted by Sep
I dont know much about American anti-missile systems so I am not going to argue about it. But if its easily stopable then why all the talk about this missile? I searched alot of sites most of them I could tell was probebly with people who didnt know what they were talking about but from what I got it had a good chance against American systems. If it doesnt why would the congress make a resolution about it? Again I am not saying the missile is unstoppable but I wanted your opinion.