It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo
Iranians have no problem with the American people. Pro-America does not mean pro-U.S. government, sorry to disappoint you. Any questions?
May 05, 2004
The New York Times
Nicholas D. Kristof
Finally, I've found a pro-American country.
Everywhere I've gone in Iran, with one exception, people have been exceptionally friendly and fulsome in their praise for the United States, and often for President Bush as well. Even when I was detained a couple of days ago in the city of Isfahan for asking a group of young people whether they thought the Islamic revolution had been a mistake (they did), the police were courteous and let me go after an apology.
They apologized; I didn't.
A sideshow of the horrendous earthquake that hit the southern Iranian city of Bam has been the warm reception that Iranians, including members of the Revolutionary Guard, have given American humanitarian-assistance teams that included U.S. military-plane crews.
These images of friendly attitude are at odds with an earlier impression of widespread hatred of America in Iran - as well as elsewhere in the world. Recent events clearly have brought to light the gratitude felt by many in Iran, but what needs far more emphasis is the strength and depth of a widespread liking and appreciation of America among Iranians of all ages and social classes.
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo
Fortunately, Iran has shown not to be cowardly and scared in the face of bullies and those who screw other nation's people for their own needs, especially when it comes to helping a guy named Saddam and kissing the feet of a monarch named Reza. So you, and General Abizaid and everyone in the U.S. gov't who agrees with you can all shove it. Way up.
Go cry to Abizaid and find more people to threaten.
Originally posted by esdad71
PRe-emptive talking is better than pre-emptive strike, no?
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
At some point it is time to act, lest one day we wake up and find out LA, London, Tel Aviv or somewhere was obliterated. And that's one thing we have government for, is to figure out just how long they can go before they must act. And with a new CIA, maybe the evidence will be a little more credible this time. I'll offer some faith, at least to that.
Originally posted by outsider
Marge you're whacked - this thread is about a US general making a warning. Not about heroin producing poppies in Afghanistan or something else in Venezuela.
[edit on 30-11-2004 by outsider]
Originally posted by The_Squid
Originally posted by smokenmirrors
Fact. The U.S. has been waging a very meticulously controlled battle in Iraq.
Fact. If the U.S. would so desire, it could obliterate Iraq in a matter of days, or sooner
Fact. If the U.S. would so desire, it could obliterate Iran in a matter of days, or sooner
Fact. If the U.S. would so desire, it could obliterate the entire region in a mater of days, or sooner.
This is absolute crap, and the only person who would say that about any country would be a country loving person who is too bigheaded to realise that its harder than it looks, and that their country is not as powerful as they think.
The only way America could do that is nuke the hell out of the region, but there would be some retaliation if the region had nukes, belonged to country that had nukes... or was even CLOSE to a country that had nukes.
Also the UN would serriously disaprove of America doing this and throw America out of the UN unless the action HAD to be done, with no other option.
Originally posted by marg6043
Originally posted by edsinger
Marg why would we care for these people, I mean we are indiscriminately killing them everyday , them evil US troops! You cant have it both ways marg.
So ed then we should allowed Mr. Bush become a Hitler and do genocide on the middle east. Right?
That is OK for you, after all your views on homosexual border on fanaticism. so lets get those less than human middle east people after all they are not christians like you.Shame on you.
Originally posted by Kriz_4
Originally posted by Muaddib
I saw the other post about opium in Afghanistan...but since when hasn't Afghanistan been an opium nation?.....
Afganistan was not an opium nation when the Taleban were in power, it was a BIG no no. I believe drug control was one of the reasons the US supported the Taleban getting in to power.
Originally posted by bodrul
out of intrest when would this be?
because as history has shown ownly one nation( USA used WMD's on a large population,
what makes you think Iran would use them in a pre-emtive strike?
( nukes are the only viable deturrent against the US and Israel )
Originally posted by edsinger
The power in the country is absolute and in a 'few' hands. The young especially are growing more disgruntled daily.
We do not have to invade as I have said, it will implode soon enough.
[edit on 30-11-2004 by edsinger]
Marge
Let them die for their nation, not my children or your children or the children of the American people.
Originally posted by Murcielago
The entire US military is voluntary, So if your one of those dumb people who sign up so they help pay for your college, Then I dont think college is gonna help you. Its not like we just are taking kids off the street and giving them a gun and shipping them to Iraq, if they are there it is because they wanted to be there, and after staying in Iraq for a month and relize that they want to go home, To Damn Bad, they should of thought about there decision more clearly.
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo
No questions. If they like Bush, fine by me. Plus it only supports what I've been saying, that the Iranians do not hate Americans and that any threats or hostility towards Iran by America is unfounded.
Again, considering America never helped Iran despite our continuing rhetoric of human rights, blah blah crap.
Tell Bush and Abizaid I said hi.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Well, good question, and here are some possible reasons:
1) the sheer hatred the Iranian people have shown for America, for starters, although to some extent I can't say I blame them.
2) the call of Jihad, or Holy War
3) the recent perception of Muslims extremists that the US defense network can be penetrated, due to 9/11 and other things.
4) I don't think that Iran would consider their act of using a WMD pre-emptive, necessarily.
5) And I don't think that they would necessarily fire the first strike.
6) It is a situation where if pre-emptive, conventional weapon strikes were issued against their nuke facilities, that they would be tempted to escalate it quickly, by firing such a WMD. It's kind of like North Korea. If we did do conventional, pre-emptive strikes on NK, Kim has threatened to immediately turn South Korea into a "sea of fire, " and many have speculated that implies the use of a WMD. Kind of like "hit me, and will I hit you back twice as hard."
And really, the immediate issue will be Israel, if Iran is known to possess WMDs. Best I can offer you, at the moment.
Regards,
TA
Originally posted by marg6043
The last time I check Terrorist are still active and making the American people unsafe every where they go.
Originally posted by marg6043Denied ignorance don't encourage it