It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Barcs
Attacking an established field of science, however, is a whole different ballpark. Sometimes it is willful ignorance and intentional preaching to recruit, but not always.
“The theory of evolution is impossible. At base, in spite of appearances, no one any longer believes in it….Evolution is a kind of dogma which the priests no longer believe, but which they maintain for their people.” ~ Paul Lemoine
"Most of what is being taught in university classrooms today, in biology, and also in physics and mathematics, is actually not science at all, but essentially a variety of religious cult, whose immediate roots can be traced, among other things, to the Cathars and Bogomils of the medieval "dark ages"!
True, this cult, which controls much of our educational system and scientific community, naturally does not advertise itself openly as a fanatic form of irrationalist belief; rather, it calls itself "the scientific establishment"; it typically brands those who refuse to accept its most egregious doctrines, as "unscientific."
Now, it is easy to show that Darwinism, one of the pillars of modern biology, is nothing but a kind of cult, a cult religion. I am not exaggerating. It has no scientific validity whatsoever. Darwin's so-called theory of evolution is based on absurdly irrational propositions, which did not come from scientific observations, but were artificially introduced from the outside, for political-ideological reasons."
Jonathan Tennenbaum: Toward a True Science of Life
originally posted by: Barcs
Sorry, but evolution is about as proven as it gets.
“Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution, we do not have one iota of fact.” ~ Dr. T. N. Tahmisian
"The Darwinian theory of descent has not a single fact to confirm it in the realm of nature. It is not the result of scientific research, but purely the product of imagination." ~ Albert Fleischmann
originally posted by: Murgatroid
Accepting a complete mathematical impossibility all on FAITH only because the priests of "the scientific establishment" say so is how some might define willful ignorance.
originally posted by: Murgatroid
originally posted by: Barcs
Attacking an established field of science, however, is a whole different ballpark. Sometimes it is willful ignorance and intentional preaching to recruit, but not always.
Accepting a complete mathematical impossibility all on FAITH only because the priests of "the scientific establishment" say so is how some might define willful ignorance.
Most people just aren't gullible enough to believe what the "scientific establishment" tells them anymore.
Mainstream academia has demonstrated over and over that everything they are pushing is is agenda driven lies.
One would HAVE to be extremely gullible in order to believe something that is so mathematically impossible that the odds of it happening are beyond calculation.
originally posted by: Murgatroid
Accepting a complete mathematical impossibility all on FAITH only because the priests of "the scientific establishment" say so is how some might define willful ignorance.
originally posted by: randyvs
IF Oilantaytambo dates back to at least 12,000 yrs. And
as we don't even understand in this day of technology
how the mountainside was carved of blocks. I think we can
easily ( more than many would like to ) assess that these
blocks were carved out of this mountainside, before the flood.
The flood that sheared of the top of the rock hillside. Whereby
the rest of the two rectangular block chasms were once intact.
And the machinery that carved those squares in granite was
obviously lost to the flood. Bye Bye evolution. Hello every
truth that is the Bible.
originally posted by: DarknStormy
a reply to: DigitalResonance
Where does the Bible or any religious text claim the Earth was flat and the Sun orbited the Earth?
originally posted by: DarknStormy
Taking advice about religion from someone who doesn't have spiritual insight is like believing a bullet through the head will make you live forever. If people are obsessed with the things in this world, they cannot be spiritually motivated let alone have spiritual insight.
originally posted by: DarknStormy
a reply to: DigitalResonance
Where does the Bible or any religious text claim the Earth was flat and the Sun orbited the Earth?
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: DarknStormy
a reply to: DigitalResonance
Where does the Bible or any religious text claim the Earth was flat and the Sun orbited the Earth?
"Joshua Chapter 10: 12-13 KJV
12Then spake Joshua to the LORD in the day when the LORD delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel, Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; and thou, Moon, in the valley of Ajalon.
13And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.
So, according to god's word, the sun stood still, not the earth"?
answers.yahoo.com...;_ylt=A0LEV09kJpdTpEgA6fhXNyoA;_ylu=X3o'___'ByMG04Z2o2BHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA2JmMQR2dGlkAw--?qid=20110225004 317AAKCrIJ
But yet so many religious folk take the bait hook line and sinker when people preach about the evil science and how it's the devil's work.
Who made the following predition: “Like the Marxists, the Darwinists are going to wind up as a cult in which few believe this side of Berkeley and Harvard Square.” Phil Johnson did over a decade ago. But these actual words are Pat Buchanan’s and were published today.
There are other questions Darwinists need to answer. If believing that Christ raised people from the dead is a matter of faith — and it is — is not the Darwinist claim that nature created life out of non-life a matter of faith? If it is science, why can’t scientists replicate it in microcosm in a laboratory?
Clearly, a continued belief in the absolute truth of Darwinist evolution is but an act of faith that fulfills a psychological need of folks who have rejected God. That picture on the wall of the science class of apes on four legs, then apes on two legs, then homo erectus walking upright is as much an expression of faith as the picture of Adam and Eve and the serpent in the Garden of Eden.
Darwinism — “A cult in which few believe this side of Berkeley and Harvard Square”
With respect to its great contributions to society, I think it is important to make a case that science is really affecting society more like a religion now than a field of study or a resource base of useful information. Many everyday people do not understand it at all and accept ALL its teachings on faith. Unfortunately some scientists and academic professionals are not so noble and have perpetrated deliberate frauds and cover-ups of important discoveries.
Modern Scientific beliefs are based upon a leap of faith in the big bang theory. It has become a belief system based on faith and therefore another form of religion. Scientists, like priests can explain their beliefs but the everyday people accept it all on faith. Scientists and doctors are the priests of this new religion, getting angry and crying "heresy" when anyone respectfully disagrees with them.
Has Science become a Religion
Science - The Illuminati Religion and Mind Control Tool for the Masses
"(Darwinism is) nothing but a kind of cult, a cult religion....It has no scientific validity whatsoever. Darwin's so-called theory of evolution is based on absurdly irrational propositions, which did not come from scientific observations, but were artificially introduced from the outside, for political-ideological reasons."
Toward a True Science of Life