posted on May, 21 2014 @ 02:19 AM
No. Rising warm air is what forms storm clouds. It is saying that cloud bands indicate the presence of gravity waves. Like this:
a reply to: Phage
Well...that's not really what this paper
says. It says that there's a link between
solar wind, the ionosphere and weather in the troposphere. They're linked because the atmospheric gravity waves in the ionosphere descend to the
Once in the troposphere, in a weakened state, they can revive, regaining strength from the wind. (Wind like the jet stream.) (Wind like hurricane
There is nothing in there about cosmic rays. Oh, I see, you think ray-tracing has to do with cosmic rays. No, it's a mathematical method of analyzing
The whole paper, in a sense, is about cosmic rays because cosmic rays are still first choice for this propagation because the solar wind is not always
available and/or there are problems getting into the troposphere and/or gravity waves were too weak. But cosmic rays have so far not co-operated.
solar wind influences on mid-latitude tropospheric circulation have been found [7,8,9] although a possible cause-effect mechanism has remained
unknown or has been attributed to cosmic ray flux modulation by the solar wind. Recently, the possibility that cosmic rays influence the cloud
nucleation process has been raised once again [10,11], but the controversy surrounding these new results has not been resolved [12,13].
And, forever, it was the pulse that got me. (The heater in Gakona and the Yukon wanderers with the scatter radar reminded me of the Eiscat set-up
where they have the facility to heat and another one to measure.)
Then why does it spend so much time talking about the high speed solar wind and making no mention of HAARP?
Siriusly? The thread OP had a video of the air force guy telling congress that they have control of the ionosphere and are now phased into
management. Other posters took that to mean that the military are well on their way to owning the weather and the ionosphere. You took it to
mean...I don't know what you took it to mean. You had a disconnect between weather and the ionosphere. I put up this link to show you that they're
joined at the hip. Since control of the ionosphere was never a stated HAARP aim (they were communicating with submarines - remember?), why would they
be telling us what to look for i.e. what the manifestations of this control are?
I say, that as usual, you use your lack of understanding to twist the actual science to fit your world view. You should try a different approach,
taking the time and making the effort to understand what the science actually says. Then you can take the next step.
My world view? I should continue to dust off my old text books then and ignore this:
which both Eastlund and the air force are telling me is HAARP spawned?