Judicial Watch: New Documents Show IRS HQ Control of Tea Party Targeting

Judicial Watch has released more damaging evidence that the IRS targeting scandal was in fact being directed by people in high places in Washington right at IRS headquarters !!

JD also cited yet another series of emails sent to the IRS Commissioner by a U.S. Senator (Democrat) "alerting" the IRS to "suspicions" (actually demands to target the "conservative groups").

This is getting hotter by the day it seems.

The IRS is guilty and no wonder Ms. Precious Lois Lerner won't talk and is now in Contempt of Congress.

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released a new batch of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) documents revealing that its handling of Tea Party applications was directed out of the agency’s headquarters in Washington, DC. The documents also show extensive pressure on the IRS by Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) to shut down conservative-leaning tax-exempt organizations. The IRS’ emails by Lois Lerner detail her misleading explanations to investigators about the targeting of Tea Party organizations.

The documents came in response to an October 2013 Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed after the agency refused to respond to four FOIA requests dating back to May 2013 (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service (No. 1:13-cv-01559)).

One key email string from July 2012 confirms that IRS Tea Party scrutiny was directed from Washington, DC. On July 6, 2010, Holly Paz (the former Director of the IRS Rulings and Agreements Division and current Manager of Exempt Organizations Guidance) asks IRS lawyer Steven Grodnitzky “to let Cindy and Sharon know how we have been handling Tea Party applications in the last few months.” .....................

Judicial Watch: New Documents Show IRS HQ Control of Tea Party Targeting


IRS's tea-party noose tightens: Targeting campaign was directed by HQ in Washington, D.C. – not by a few 'rogue agents' in Ohio, documents reveal

a reply to: xuenchen
Suppression of freedom and liberty.

Somebody needs to hang. That is all.

a reply to: xuenchen

And yet, nothing. No criminal charges and arrests. When was the last arrest?

How can we force arrests legally?

originally posted by: Not Authorized
a reply to: xuenchen

And yet, nothing. No criminal charges and arrests. When was the last arrest?

How can we force arrests legally?

Unfortunately when you have a lawless President and a lawless Attorney General, criminal themselves, you can expect them to protect their cohorts. It works for a while but eventually the dike breaks and the truth comes flooding out. Just ask Richard Nixon, well you can't actually ask him unless you speak with dead people but you know what i mean.

a reply to: whywhynot

No other legal recourse? Nothing we could do? Legally? Research.

Anyone who thinks this did not come from the White House is delusional.

originally posted by: Not Authorized
a reply to: whywhynot

No other legal recourse? Nothing we could do? Legally? Research.

Impeach and convict them but you would need a significant pickup in the mid-terms. As a practical matter that is it, With the Senate and Presidency held by Dems you got your hands tied. You can shine a few lights on the lawlessness but it will just be deflected until there is enough voter outrage.

a reply to: whywhynot

This is a Common Law nation. We have no recourse? Impeachment and voting? That's it? What about the SCOTUS, as corrupt as they are.... what did they say about it? They have told you how to fix it. So have attorneys. Including former attorney general's. It just never made it to the news. Shocking right?

Start here: www.law.cornell.edu...

Now read TITLE 18 USC 3332.

www.law.cornell.edu...

What about Article I, Section 8, of the US Constitution? Can the militia uphold the laws of the union?

We are not so helpless as we are being led to believe.

No worries folks, The Grand Supreme Leader Chairman Obama, takes these allegations very, very seriously. ~$heopleNation

a reply to: Not Authorized

So exactly who would form the grand jury and/or bring suit? Not anyone in Eric Holder's in-justice dept.