It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
American entrepreneurialism is dying a slow and steady death.
Before Reagan came to Washington, small mom and pop shops were the backbone of our economy. You could walk down any main street or strip mall in this country, and it would be rare to find a big box retailer or a large chain store.
If you needed groceries, you went to the local grocer. If you needed a new hammer, you went to the local hardware store.
But then Reagan came along.
He stopped enforcing the Sherman Anti-Trust Act in 1982, and handed out massive and unfair tax breaks to large corporations and their executives and stockholders, all at the expense of the small businesses that had built the American economy.
As a result, mom and pop stores began to close, because they simply couldn't afford to compete with the big box stores that were growing out of control.
This is a trend that has been going on ever since Reagan stepped foot inside the White House.
Similarly, it's time stop giving massive subsidies to large corporations, and instead encourage the Small Business Administration to give more money to true mom and pop kinds of businesses.
We should also listen to Sen. Bernie Sanders, and strip federal highway money from any state that tries to lure business away from another state.
Next, we need to bring back the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, so that corporations can no longer grow out-of-control and eat up Main Street USA.
originally posted by: Bilk22
We've had a few presidents since Reagan was in office. Neither Republican nor Democrat did anything to change this. Got anything else? How about pointing the finger at the current administration? We're into the second term if you didn't know
“General Motors, like American business in general, is ‘plainly in trouble’ because intellectual bromides have been substituted for a sound intellectual exposition of its point of view.” Mr. St. John then commented on the tendency of business leaders to compromise with and appease critics. He cited the concessions which Nader wins from management, and spoke of “the fallacious view many businessmen take toward their critics.” He drew a parallel to the mistaken tactics of many college administrators: “College administrators learned too late that such appeasement serves to destroy free speech, academic freedom and genuine scholarship. One campus radical demand was conceded by university heads only to be followed by a fresh crop which soon escalated to what amounted to a demand for outright surrender.”
If our system is to survive, top management must be equally concerned with protecting and preserving the system itself.
The WTO has probably had the largest negative impact on the US economy across all sectors. That happened in 1995. Clinton was president. Let's add NAFTA under G. HW Bush/Clinton to that as well. Should we be surprised these men would be influenced by money from big business concerns?
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: Bilk22
We've had a few presidents since Reagan was in office. Neither Republican nor Democrat did anything to change this. Got anything else? How about pointing the finger at the current administration? We're into the second term if you didn't know
Sorry if I was offense to you. I'm pointing out a turning point - In fact, I think Saint Ronnie was (and all presidents since Jimmy Carter) are mearly figureheads.
Take offense? No. However I take exception to the idea that hope and change was the order of the day and yet nothing has given us hope for change and the left constantly looks right to point fingers of blame. Got it?
originally posted by: FyreByrd
a reply to: Bilk22
Not at all and as my posts have pointed out I agree it is across the board, hence the reference to the Powell Memo....
You seem to be taking offence at my disparagement of Ronald Reagan; well I take offense at the 'Saintificattion" of this puppet.