It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
The "space experts" are charlatans. That is my statement.
My feelings are hurt
NOT.
Well, I noticed in the old news clips that the term "space expert" and "western space expert" or "space official" is always used when they are trying to guide the propaganda narrative.
That's why I had to draw the line.
This glittering generality of calling people "space experts" is something that we have accepted as normal but it should be set aside, as it is getting in the way of what should be a rational discussion about the Russian Glass Ceiling - from historical sources.
Did you hear the story about the CIA commandos who kidnapped a Soviet Luna satellite right from under the noses of the Russians, tore it apart, took pictures of it, put it all back together and those dummy Reds never found out about it??
io9.com...
That's not something you will find over at the NASA gift shop. So, what is your opinion on history Mr. Oberg? Is it concrete or what?
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
This glittering generality of calling people "space experts" is something that we have accepted as normal but it should be set aside, as it is getting in the way of what should be a rational discussion about the Russian Glass Ceiling - from historical sources.
Capitalising the words doesn't make it an official term or lend it some sort of authority. It'd a fake term you've made up for something that doesn't exist.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
This glittering generality of calling people "space experts" is something that we have accepted as normal but it should be set aside, as it is getting in the way of what should be a rational discussion about the Russian Glass Ceiling - from historical sources.
Capitalising the words doesn't make it an official term or lend it some sort of authority. It'd a fake term you've made up for something that doesn't exist.
pretty much everybody denies Russian Glass Ceiling @ 475km
originally posted by: Rob48
SJ, assuming that Space Adventures do indeed take two very rich people around the moon in the next few years (is one of them Jarrah White? Has his PayPal account come up trumps?), will you promise to go away?
Roscosmos Disavows Plan to Send Space Tourists to Moon, Moscow Times
"Russia's space agency, Roscosmos, will not be involved in a plan to send two space tourists on a flight around the Moon and was not consulted about the project, the federal space agency said. The mission, hatched by U.S.-based space tourism firm Space Adventures and a major Russian spacecraft manufacturer, Energia Rocket and Space Corporation, would see two space tourists travel to the Moon aboard a modified Russian Soyuz spacecraft by 2017. However, Roscosmos was kept out of the loop on the plan. The organizers "could have consulted with us before making such loud announcements," said Denis Lyskov, Roscosmos's deputy chief in charge of piloted flights, Izvestia reported Monday."
A private expedition to the Moon, Space Adventures
"Using flight proven Russian spacecraft we will fly two private citizens and one professional cosmonaut on a free return trajectory around the far side of the moon. They will come within 100km of the Moon's surface. If you chose to join this mission you will see the illuminated far-side of the Moon, and then witness the amazing sight of the Earth rising above the surface of the Moon. We expect our first mission to launch by 2017."
"The first of two $150 million tickets for a pioneering tourist mission to the moon was off the market Sunday, and its owner was rumored to be the world-famous "Avatar" director James Cameron. Space Adventures, the American company offering the trip scheduled for 2015, said only that the buyer of the ticket was a "well-known" personality. The expedition will begin aboard a Soyuz spaceship launched from Kazakhstan."
edit on 7/30/2014 by SayonaraJupiter because: (no reason given)
originally posted by: Rob48
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter
I personally don't believe this particular trip will happen in 2017 either. But it won't be long before people are back there.
By the way, 25 pages and you still haven't answered: why do YOU think Russia hasn't sent anyone beyond LEO?
originally posted by: Rob48
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter
When you say "satellite killers" you actually mean "surveillance satellites", don't you? How do surveillance satellites kill anything?
Delta IV Launch:
The Air Force Space Command 4 (AFSPC-4) mission comprises two Geosynchronous Space Situational Awareness Program (GSSAP) spacecraft and the Air Force Research Lab’s Automated Navigation and Guidance Experiment for Local Space (ANGELS).
ATKGSSAP is a four-satellite constellation being developed by the US Air Force to conduct visual monitoring of geosynchronous satellites. The first two spacecraft are being carried by today’s launch, with the remaining two expected to ride an Atlas V into orbit next year.
[...]
The ANGELS satellite, which has a mass of around 70 kilograms (150 lb), is a technology demonstrator which will be operated by the Air Force Research Laboratory. Also constructed by Orbital Sciences, this satellite is designed for one year of service.
As part of Air Force Research Laboratory’s research in advanced Space Situational Awareness (SSA), the ANGELS program examines techniques for providing a clearer picture of the environment around our vital space assets.
[...]
Features:
The ANGELS spacecraft hosts an SSA sensor payload to evaluate techniques for detection, tracking, and characterizing of space objects, as well as, attribution of actions in space. Additional payloads that aid spacecraft operations include a GPS system for GEO and high performance accelerometers. The GPS system uses advanced algorithms from NASA to receive GPS side lobe signals and generate near continuous navigation solutions. The high performance accelerometers precisely measure small spacecraft accelerations for enhanced guidance and navigation. Additional sensor technologies for safe relative navigation will also be tested. The experimental on board vehicle safety system explores methods for dramatically reducing the probability of collision with other space objects in an increasingly congested space environment.
US launches 2 spy geo-satellites to track ‘nefarious capability’ of other nations
Published time: July 29, 2014 09:14 Get short URL
Neither the costs, nor technical details of the GSSAP program have so far been released.
The GSSAP program “will bolster our ability to discern when adversaries attempt to avoid detection and to discover capabilities they may have which might be harmful to our critical assets at these higher altitudes," Shelton said in the speech. Source rt.com...
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: Rob48
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter
When you say "satellite killers" you actually mean "surveillance satellites", don't you? How do surveillance satellites kill anything?
unless im mistaken i believe he means lasers..
he was at one time saying that the communication laser onboard ladee was used to fry satellites that would image the moon..
and no im not joking.