It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
originally posted by: Rob48
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter
What he is saying is that you can't present news clippings about Zond as 100% fact and not also accept news clippings about Apollo. You don't get to cherry pick like that.
And yes, of course the Zond missions were dry runs for manned missions. Who denied that? But they couldn't have landed a man on the moon, or even put a man into lunar orbit, using the same rocket they used to send turtles AROUND the moon.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
If you support the 1981 CIA video then you will say so.
www.youtube.com...
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
If you support the 1981 CIA video then you will say so.
www.youtube.com...
When you've finished barking out orders and demanding that people do your bidding, maybe you could state specifically what it is that you disagree with in this video. Having now watched it, other than conveniently neglecting to mention the US's own military space programs, I fail to find anything particularly controversial about it.
if anything is incorrect in the video, feel free to identify it.
originally posted by: Rob48
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
originally posted by: Rob48
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter
What he is saying is that you can't present news clippings about Zond as 100% fact and not also accept news clippings about Apollo. You don't get to cherry pick like that.
And yes, of course the Zond missions were dry runs for manned missions. Who denied that? But they couldn't have landed a man on the moon, or even put a man into lunar orbit, using the same rocket they used to send turtles AROUND the moon.
They did go beyond it, with circumlunar missions including biological payloads.
?
DDI called attention to today's item in the CIB showing that the Soviet's largest space booster exploded on the launching pad on 3 July
It was believed that this CIB of August 15, 1969 contains information on the DMSP-Block-4B weather film based image photograph of the Central Asia explosion flash from the July 3-4, 1969, launch failure on or about 20:18:32 UT.
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter
....And yes, the Vick believes exists does not exist, because it can not exist. The chances of a satellite passing overhead at precisely the moment the rocket exploded are so slim as to be impossible. I am more than happy to admit that I am wrong should that photograph emerge, but my view is that the explosion's appearance in a satellite image can't happen. .....
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
The "space experts" are charlatans. That is my statement.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
a reply to: Rob48
You are not a "space expert" so you can sit down.
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
The "space experts" are charlatans. That is my statement.
My feelings are hurt
NOT.