It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
If the Zond-5 mission were safe for human spaceflight (late 1968) then this proves that the Russians had the equipment : Soyuz 7K capsule, Proton-K launcher to perform the lunar fly-by mission which.. they.. never.. attempted.. (for reasons that we will obviously disagree on.)
originally posted by: mrwiffler
OK, the thread is about radiation. Radiation = no Apollo.
Show us your data about the deadly radiation and we'll show you ours...for the millionth time.
Radiation protection problems on earth and in space are discussed. Flight through the Van Allen belts and into space beyond the geomagnetic shielding was recognized as hazardous before the advent of manned space flight.
Specialized dosimetry systems were developed for use on the Apollo spacecraft, and systems for solar-particle-event warning and dose rojection were de-vised. Radiation sources of manmade origin on board the Apollo spacecraft present additional problems. Methods applied to evaluate and control or avoid the various Apollo radiation hazards are discussed.
originally posted by: mrwiffler
OK, the thread is about radiation. Radiation = no Apollo.
Show us your data about the deadly radiation and we'll show you ours...for the millionth time.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
Those paying more attention will realize that the Russians didn't truly need an N-1 rocket to perform the lunar orbit mission. The Zond 5 September 1966 mission proved the Russians were safe for manned exploration beyond 475km altitude.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
Pete Conrad suggested (and this was news to me when I found it) that NASA had considered a TitanII/Gemini lunar orbit mission.
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
Those paying more attention will realize that the Russians didn't truly need an N-1 rocket to perform the lunar orbit mission. The Zond 5 September 1966 mission proved the Russians were safe for manned exploration beyond 475km altitude.
very misleading..
you take one mission and put your own speculation in to fit your agenda..
when was it when the soviets finally worked out their re-entry procedures to be safe enough for manned flights??
"The flight was survivable, and a manned followup mission was clearly in Zonds future." Source news.discovery.com...
you take one mission and put your own speculation in to fit your agenda..
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
The Zond 5 landed successfully. The turtles pulled 20g's and survived. Even the western media mainstream outlets like Discovery.com agrees that,
Is the Discovery Channel an acceptable source to you? They say that the Soviets had a dual track to the moon and they did not need the N-1 rocket to orbit the moon.
What's your agenda choos?
originally posted by: choos
whats yours?? apparently you think 20g re-entry is survivable...
Like many other astronauts, Grissom knew his work was dangerous, but important. He is quoted in the book Footprints on the Moon as saying, "If we die, we want people to accept it. We're in a risky business, and we hope that if anything happens to us it will not delay the program. The conquest of space is worth the risk of life." Source www.biography.com...-first-astronauts&awesm=~oGLgTAX2SazwYV
According to the authors, Komarov answered: "If I don't make this flight, they'll send the backup pilot instead." That was Yuri Gagarin. Vladimir Komarov couldn't do that to his friend. "That's Yura," the book quotes him saying, "and he'll die instead of me. We've got to take care of him." Komarov then burst into tears. Source www.npr.org...
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
and why did it pull 20 Gs SJ?
Was it planned to do that or did it go wrong somehow?
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
and why did it pull 20 Gs SJ?
Was it planned to do that or did it go wrong somehow?
Every astronaut and every cosmonaut knew the risks.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
They all knew (astronauts, cosmonauts and rocket designers) that something might go wrong with any given mission. So I think your question about survival of 20g's is irrelevant. Zond 5 was viable for a manned lunar orbit mission.
And... for the millionth time .... this is not an Apollo hoax thread,
originally posted by: mrwiffler
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter
And... for the millionth time .... this is not an Apollo hoax thread,
Tell us why you think the Russians didn't send people beyond the Van Allen belts(I bet you won't tell us)
originally posted by: mrwiffler
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter
And... for the millionth time .... this is not an Apollo hoax thread,
Tell us why you think the Russians didn't send people beyond the Van Allen belts(I bet you won't tell us)
originally posted by: choos
at what point were the russians able to prove their missions would have a survivable re-entry acceleration??
he was killed when the Soyuz 1 space capsule crashed after re-entry on April 24, 1967 due to a parachute failure.[1] However, because he died when the capsule crashed into ground, he is not considered the first human fatality in outer space. Source Wiki