If you even care to look at the politics of climate science you will find it ripe with fraud and misrepresentation. Thank God some politicians are
willing to stand up and risk ridicule from the REALLY uneducated and at least try to show this fiasco for what it is. If Rubio did this, that's great.
This is mostly a repeat (with some additions), but quite frankly, I'm tired of going over the same stuff again and again:
In a place that purports to question authority and "deny ignorance" it is amazing how many ATS members swallow the Global warming hysteria hook, line,
and sinker. Anything else the MSM tells us and we're all "You're lying!" and come up with conspiracies to explain the so-called "facts" we're being
fed. But if a mainstream "scientist" says, "Global warming is gonna getcha if you don't watch out!" then we're all willing to dump our cars, go vegan,
and consent to NWO Global Rule with hardly a whimper. OP is in this category. Everything is a conspiracy, except scientists dependent on government
funding for their careers, in which case everything they say is gospel truth.
Why don't we question this more? Why don't we look up the history? Why don’t we investigate alternative explanations?
OK, LET'S JUST TAKE THIS AT FACE VALUE:
Fine, all the scientists are right. It's warming up (Please ignore the last decade for awhile) and WE caused it. So what's going to happen? The Sierra
will expand. Warm places will get warmer. Some people will die because of it because some governments and bureaucrats were inept in getting them food
and water. It's not that it doesn't exist. It's just that fools with guns like to disrupt supply chains.
Meanwhile some cold places will warm up and some people won't die of cold. Places like Canada and Siberia will become bread baskets and major grain
producers. You'll be able to grow wine grapes in Scotland (again!) and support farms and livestock in Greenland (again!) You'll spend more on air
conditioning, but less on furnaces.
When we had a whole lot of carbon in times past, we had lush forests with common bracken ferns growing 40 feet tall. The entire Earth was a garden of
plants. As long as you could avoid plodding Brontosaurus feet there was plenty for everyone. (Now don't go getting pedantic on me by self-righteously
pointing out your simplistic knowledge that there was no such thing as a Brontosaurus, OK? Spare me the friggin' grief!)
Besides, your alternative is what, exactly? [Insert drum roll here]. Another Ice Age! Yup! That's right. Look at the record. It's time for one. I
don't know about you, but I kinda think avoiding one of those global glacier thingies is not a bad idea at all.
AND WHAT IF IT ISN'T TRUE, OR AT LEAST NOT MAN MADE?
You know by now, I hope, that Gore's "Hockey Stick" is BS, right? (OK. It's because the program that produces the hockey stick will do so every time
the input is "red noise." What is red noise? White noise is random data. Red noise is random from the last data point, like stock prices. If you put
stock prices in the program that produced the hockey stick, you ALWAYS get a hockey stick. neat, huh?) And you DID actually read and study the
Climategate emails and files, right? And as a result you do know that the "science" holding up this preposterous Global Warming fiasco is a house of
cards of faulty computer programs, erroneous data, fudged reports with political overtones, and just plain screw-ups, right?
Want an example of fraud? OK Here ya go:
Pretty, cool, huh? And WHY is this important? because the green line is TREE RING DATA and it is tree ring data that acts as a "proxy" (since no one
bothered to put real thermometers online thousands of years ago) to "represent" temperature. If a tree ring is THICKER, that represents MORE GROWTH
and HOTTER temperatures (Wait!! More GROWTH?!? What's THAT all about?!) If a tree ring is THINNER, well, it's colder, probably, unless thick and thin
is a matter of the presence of water instead of temperature, but Shhhh! Don't bring that up!)
But ANYWAY the real point is that the green line is tree rings and while everything else shows an INCREASE in temperature, the green line is showing a
DECREASE, therefore the tree ring data is LYING! And if it is not accurate TODAY, WHY are we using it as a proxy for how warm it was in the distant
Tough question, huh? The answer? MAKE IT DISAPPEAR and THAT’S what “Hide the decline” means! Why did they do it? Because they did not want to
explain it and thought it would "confuse" you. And that is an example of SCIENTIFIC FRAUD (one of many) in this global warming debate. You've got
computer programs that don’t work, data that is fudged, and outright fraud such as “hide the decline.” But hey! "Scientists" say it's true, so
you better believe!
If you KNOW all this, why the hell do you still believe these jokers?
But hey, let’s look at some more data. Here’s a cool graph!
This shows temperatures over thousands of years have been DECLINING. What’s up with that? Here you can see there was a Roman Warm Period that was
hotter than today, a Medieval Warm Period that was warmer than today, and a “Little Ice Age” in the 1700s that was positively chilly, but, when we
compare to today, well, today is definitely warmer, therefore Global Warming must be real.
But you don’t have to take my word on it. Take a look at the
Hockey Stick Illusion
and read all about it.
There's no doubt that climate is changing. IT ALWAYS HAS! But there is no guarantee that climate will always be like we've known it for the last 200
or so years.It will change, and so will we. We have adapted before and we will again, but there's absolutely no reason to run around like Chicken
Little saying the sky is falling.
So if Rubio said this, no matter what party he is from, that's great in my book. HE OUGHT TO BE APPLAUDED! I wish more people were intelligent enough
to see through this fiasco. What is mystifying is that ATS, supposedly a place to deny ignorance, takes this on as if it we hard-core proven science
when it is anything but. To put it in conspiracy terms you are more likely to understand, this is the "scientific propaganda wing" for the NWO
designed specifically to justify taking away your freedoms and ushering you into a lifetime of poverty and making you like it at the same time.
ATS, if you believe this crap, you have drunk the Kool Aid, and may God have mercy on your souls.
edit on 5/12/2014 by schuyler because: fix
link to book
edit on 5/12/2014 by schuyler because: (no reason given)