Holy Cow! Judge Orders Investigation Into Obama’s Fake Social Security Number

page: 4
60
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 12 2014 @ 07:39 AM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce
Thanks for your reply
"An investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security number (SSN) has been illegally used by Obama: Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, emigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 in or about March, 1977. Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut. His SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among those reserved for Connecticut residents. Obama never lived or worked in that state, so there is no reason for his SSN to start with the digits 042"

If understand correctly he was Jean Ludwig was not issued this Connecticut SSN until 1977 which was after 1936 when the numbering scheme was designed. Then it could be credible claim this was a Connecticut SSN that may had been illegally used afterward?

edit on 12-5-2014 by gmoneystunt because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 12 2014 @ 07:45 AM
link   
a reply to: gmoneystunt

This has been debunked many, many, many times. Here.



posted on May, 12 2014 @ 08:11 AM
link   
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
Thanks



posted on May, 12 2014 @ 08:34 AM
link   
Y'all do realize if there were any truth to the BC or the SS number conspiracy, Fox News would dedicate all 24 hours to coverage. As well as every talk radio host.


Yall quite literally can't be actually thinking out y'all's theory.... If there were some illuminati types who set Obama up to be president. They would have just picked an American instead of him. There are plenty of puppets. No need to take a risk with Obama.



posted on May, 12 2014 @ 08:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: gmoneystunt
a reply to: hellobruce
Thanks for your reply
"An investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security number (SSN) has been illegally used by Obama: Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, emigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 in or about March, 1977.


Why do birthers post such easily debunked lies?


Various social security databases say the Obama number was issued around 1977 and Dr. Kate says that Ludwig’s SSN was issued in 1977 too — only that’s not right. It was issued in 1951. Here’s the entry for Ludwig from the Social Security Death Index: SSDI entry for Jean Ludwig from Ancestry.com Dr. Kate updated her article twice, but still failed to include the most important piece of information, Ludwig’s actual SSN. Among the 189 comments approved on this article, not one mentions the actual SSN either, nor the 1951 issue date.


www.obamaconspiracy.org...



posted on May, 12 2014 @ 09:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: gmoneystunt
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
Thanks



You're welcome.



posted on May, 12 2014 @ 09:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Not Authorized
a reply to: buster2010

No. The government does not create its own money. The taxes do not go where you think they go. Your argument is invalid.


You have heard there is such a thing as state taxes and federal taxes right? So it seems like your knowledge of what is really going on is invalid.



posted on May, 12 2014 @ 09:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Not Authorized
a reply to: hellobruce

Really. Lets put the suspect birth certificate among a grand jury of graphic design experts.

Lynch mob indeed.


The person that help to design the program that was used to copy the birth certificate said it was real. So why waste time with some graphic design experts who are second rate when compared to this guy.

Expert: No Doubt Obama's Birth Certificate Is Legit

edit on 12-5-2014 by buster2010 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 12 2014 @ 10:31 AM
link   
a reply to: buster2010

You are out of order sir. Why did you ignore that juries are the highest court? Why are you so afraid of them? If their is nothing to hide, the legal system used properly, will tell us all the truth. No more assumptions on either side

I am about to dismiss the whole preface to your argument. It is our right to have a properly functioning government. The people are the 4th branch. We demand discovery.

Put ALL of the evidence together in front of a competent grand jury. Lets see what they come up with.



posted on May, 12 2014 @ 10:59 AM
link   
My BS meter went off the charts...

#1 This is Orly Taint
#2 Judges don't order investigations, investigative departments do.



posted on May, 12 2014 @ 11:19 AM
link   
The SSA is a federal entity. They will be ordered to not comply. This will go nowhere.



posted on May, 12 2014 @ 11:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: Not Authorized
a reply to: nugget1

Who owns Snopes?

Let the legal system decide, actually using the law.


Until it's Cliven Bundy being discussed. Then the legal system is all screwed up.



posted on May, 12 2014 @ 11:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi


I am not sure why people think things would get better after that oh and Biden could then pardon Obama. I swear some of the birthers were short changed on brain cells when they were handing them out because they actually think something will come of all the BS moaning.


Yes! That!!

I only got as far as your post, Grimp, and decided to go ahead and post.


@Elouina:
So?
What is it you expect would happen if somehow, miraculously, this birther bs was tried and true?
WHAT is it you expect to be the result????

Will it somehow fix our country? Will it change the fact that we live in a country ruled by the rich and politicians who are OWNED by those rich?

What the hell difference does it make now????

None.
It won't change a damned thing, in my opinion.
But - if you have a plan or ideas for how it would change anything, then please, explain it.

For my part, if this next election winds up being Hillary Clinton vs Jeb Bush - well, we are sunk. It will be even more of a regime than it already is.

How much energy do you actually expend on this ludicrous snipe hunt? And what POSSIBLE difference would it make?



posted on May, 12 2014 @ 11:52 AM
link   
a reply to: amfirst1


lol

I expect to see on the lamestream news media in the future:
'Judge dies in freak accident while on vacation'.
I also think Michelle is possibly a man, and after they leave the whitehouse, they will say "surprise!!!". I watched the documebntary about her fingers and "other" features. There is something not right about these people. I still LOL over their fake garden and trying to convince people that they are just ordinary folk'. haha
Thanks for posting this info



posted on May, 12 2014 @ 12:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Fylgje
a reply to: amfirst1


lol

I expect to see on the lamestream news media in the future:
'Judge dies in freak accident while on vacation'.
I also think Michelle is possibly a man, and after they leave the whitehouse, they will say "surprise!!!". I watched the documebntary about her fingers and "other" features. There is something not right about these people. I still LOL over their fake garden and trying to convince people that they are just ordinary folk'. haha
Thanks for posting this info


It was in a youtube video so it must be true? I'm sure you expect to see a lot of things that don't happen. Ironically, rational people are of the opinion that there is something not right about birthers.



posted on May, 12 2014 @ 12:25 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

Seconded. The degree of frankly insane intensity on the part of Oreally Taitz speaks of something far nastier at work.



posted on May, 12 2014 @ 12:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: theantediluvian

Seconded. The degree of frankly insane intensity on the part of Oreally Taitz speaks of something far nastier at work.



Yeah, like a refusal to follow the prescription dosage.


(post by thekingofthebirds removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)

posted on May, 12 2014 @ 01:03 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on May, 12 2014 @ 01:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: gmoneystunt

This has been debunked many, many, many times. Here.



"Refuted", maybe. Not "debunked" as in "proven untrue". Your source offers an alternative explanation for these anomalies and that's all really.





top topics
 
60
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join