Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Holy Cow! Judge Orders Investigation Into Obama’s Fake Social Security Number

page: 2
60
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 11 2014 @ 07:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: amfirst1
Another dead judge. We all know Obama was a creation from the CIA.


You should know that this particular judge was nominated by Obama. What does that matter though, right?




posted on May, 11 2014 @ 08:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: elouina
Orly Taitz had a rock solid case that no judge could ignore.


No she did not, just her normal lies and crap.


Obama used another persons social security number on his TAXES.


No he did not - that is just a birther lie, like all the other lies they spread.

If you had done a bit of research you would know the person they claim Obama's SSN is for, Harrison Bounel, never even existed!


Judge Orders Investigation Into Obama’s Fake Social Security Number


Care to show us all exactly where the judge orders an investigation? No, I did not think you could!

Even twlithotp says

there is nothing in this clip, nothing saying that a judge made a decision, there s no decision yet



Wow all you guys seem so angry lol
smile



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 08:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: MobiusOne
Wow all you guys seem so angry lol


What makes you think someone is angry by simply pointing out lies and crap?

This thread is just a hoax, as the judge did not order any investigation....



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 08:19 PM
link   
One question - if this women is such a liar and so crazy, why hasn't she been debarred yet? Wouldn't her Obama accusations/lies (if they are so) call for swift action againt her?

Sorry, that was two questions...

What am I missing with this situation?



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 08:22 PM
link   
So, a judge with no power to do so subpoena'd his bc.

In other news, these actual, real stuff going on in the world.
edit on 11-5-2014 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 08:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: six67seven
One question - if this women is such a liar and so crazy, why hasn't she been debarred yet?


As she is not causing any harm to clients the Californian Bar are not interested.


Wouldn't her Obama accusations/lies (if they are so) call for swift action againt her?


Well, she has been sanctioned twice to a total of $24,000....


What am I missing with this situation?


She is just a crazy lady posting a lot of crap, no one cares about her rantings.

remember, she has even lost her cases to a empty chair...
edit on 11-5-2014 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 08:40 PM
link   
WHO "IS" Obama ?

Barack Barry Soetoro Subuh Sumohadiwidjojo ?

Gotta wonder .... Adopted orphan ?

All a cultist agenda ?

SHOCKER! Loretta Fuddy - The Cult of Subud - Barack Obama and His REAL FATHER?

www.youtube.com...

Muhammad Subuh Sumohadiwidjojo

He has his Father's eyes




edit on May-11-2014 by xuenchen because:




posted on May, 11 2014 @ 08:56 PM
link   
I wonder what kinds of devilry Barry & Co. are planning as we battle over porkchops..



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 10:24 PM
link   
a reply to: buster2010

Huh? Lawsuits, cost? What planet do you live on?

How much is that a percent of, in terms of printed money out of nothing, this year alone?

Please. Any cost is a small price to pay for the truth at this point. We actually need thousands of said cases against any government oddity right now. Or do you continue to want to live in this 1984 like oligarchy, that cares nothing about human rights?

Seriously man, talking about human rights can get you listed as a terrorist right now. Even so much, to bomb you via drone.

Whose side are you on?
edit on 11-5-2014 by Not Authorized because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 10:26 PM
link   
For what it's worth, this from Snopes:



An item from February 2013 resurrected the claim that Barack Obama was using someone else's Social Security number, this time a SSN supposedly belonging to one Harrison J. Bounel: Who is Harrison J. Bounel? According to the 2009 tax return submitted by President Barack Obama, he's the President of the United States. All nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to discuss this anomaly today. The case in question is Edward Noonan, et al v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State, and the Justices are finally looking at it thanks to the dogged determination of Orly Taitz. The case calls into question many of the documents Obama (Bounel, Soetoro, Soebarkah, etc.) has used and/or released as authentic since he came on the national scene. The case contends that the documents — birth certificate, Social Security number, Selective Service registration, etc. — are fakes or forgeries. If that's the case, Obama should not have been on the California ballot in 2008 and, therefore, should not have received the State’s electoral votes. This claim stems from nothing more than the observation that a search of a personal information database back in 2011 showed that the name "Harrison J. Bounel" had been mistakenly cross-indexed with Barack Obama's home address and Social Security number. (This type of error is common in such databases and has since been corrected.) Aside from that temporary erroneous entry, there is no evidence whatsoever that Barack Obama ever used the name "Harrison J. Bounel" as an alias, or that Barack Obama's Social Security number was originally issued to someone by that name. Read more at www.snopes.com...


www.snopes.com...



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 10:28 PM
link   
a reply to: nugget1

Who owns Snopes?

Let the legal system decide, actually using the law.
edit on 11-5-2014 by Not Authorized because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 10:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Not Authorized
a reply to: nugget1

Who owns Snopes?



The snopes.com web site is (and always has been) a completely independent, self-sufficient entity wholly owned by its operators, Barbara and David Mikkelson, and funded through advertising revenues. Neither the site nor its operators has ever received monies from (or been engaged in any business or editorial relationship with), any sponsor, investor, partner, political party, religious group, business organization, government agency, or any other outside group or organization.



Let the legal system decide, actually using the law.


It has decided,birthers have lost every single court case they have attempted, over 200 of them!


Birther Scorecard & String Cite: Birthers Win *O* - Lose - 220 | Pending - 6 | Total - 226


www.scribd.com...



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 10:48 PM
link   
Welcome to 2011.



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 10:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
Yet another non-event in birther history.

here's the fixed link to your Orly Taitz source

Judge Orders Investigation Into Obama’s Fake Social Security Number

That's a complete and utter lie. It's not even a half-truth — it's just an out and out lie.






Is it also a lie that he sealed his college records. Personally I think something is wrong with this picture but I am not sure what.



Also it is ironic how you are defending this man using the word......LIE.



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 11:10 PM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce

Prove your opinion using the law. We are an oligarchy. Things are not working the way they should be. That is fact.

If there is nothing to fear, let this case move forward. Let us see if it is true, or not.
edit on 11-5-2014 by Not Authorized because: Sigh



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 11:11 PM
link   
Actually, if you read the link that goes to Snopes, they agree that his SS# is a Connecticut SS #. They just try to explain it away using as much speculation and misdirection as the so called birthers do. " well that just means that the address that the SS# application was mailed to was from Connecticut" " I t could mean that a number was wrongly typed" " blah blah blah". For a supposedly truth seeking website they sure do like to spread the bull puckey around pretty thickly.
edit on 11-5-2014 by azdaze because: (no reason given)
edit on 11-5-2014 by azdaze because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 11:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Not Authorized
a reply to: buster2010

Huh? Lawsuits, cost? What planet do you live on?

How much is that a percent of, in terms of printed money out of nothing, this year alone?

Please. Any cost is a small price to pay for the truth at this point. We actually need thousands of said cases against any government oddity right now. Or do you continue to want to live in this 1984 like oligarchy, that cares nothing about human rights?

Seriously man, talking about human rights can get you listed as a terrorist right now. Even so much, to bomb you via drone.

Whose side are you on?


Every case this nut has brought to court she has lost. Who do you think pays for these cases to go to court? The tax payers that's who. This idiot wasn't even smart enough to file the complaint right. You want to know why this is being brought up again after almost a year? Because she wants to run for attorney general of California and she thinks the birthers will help her get the job. Heck even Bill O'Reilly who hates Obama thinks she is nut.



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 11:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: azdaze
they agree that his SS# is a Connecticut SS #.


SSN's are not state based, so there is no such thing as a "Connecticut" SSN....


Note: One should not make too much of the "geographical code." It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information. The numbering scheme was designed in 1936 (before computers) to make it easier for SSA to store the applications in our files in Baltimore since the files were organized by regions as well as alphabetically. It was really just a bookkeeping device for our own internal use and was never intended to be anything more than that.

www.ssa.gov...



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 11:41 PM
link   
a reply to: SubTruth



Is it also a lie that he sealed his college records.

He didn't have to seal his college records. College records are like birth certificates they are a matter of private record not public.



posted on May, 11 2014 @ 11:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Not Authorized
If there is nothing to fear, let this case move forward. Let us see if it is true, or not.


Well, the information Taitz presented in this case is the same crap she presented in every previous case, and the courts have declared it to be crap. Which is why she has lost every birther court case she has attempted.

We are also still waiting for the OP to show exactly where the judge ordered a investigation, funny how they seem to be unable to find that info!
edit on 11-5-2014 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)






top topics



 
60
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join