It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Aphorism
Oh come on, that's not very fair now is it? Not all spiritual people deny science, some see it as a means to understand what is outside of self, but they also understand that science can't understand what is inside of us.
What is consciousness but the immaterial "substance" that allows for scientific discovery to take place? One leads to the other, not the other way around. You can be both scientific and spiritual at the same time, there's no need for a division between the two, they're two sides of the same coin.
originally posted by: Kashai
Hitler. Stalin and Mao thought they were doing the correct thing.
originally posted by: sparrowstail
But what about those who dedicate their lives to good? Ghandi, Dali lama, mother Teresa, etc. Were these folks oscilating at a higher frequency in their purity and desire to do good?
originally posted by: Kashai
They were defined in history as people who never killed or harmed anyone...
"The falsification of history has done more to impede human development than any one thing known to mankind" - Rousseau
“the biggest cover-up in the history of mankind is the history of mankind itself”
During his period as a law student in London, he joined the Theosophical Society and may have been recruited by MI-6. Ghandi was assassinated because he was an Illuminati agent who had betrayed the Hindu cause. As a Freemason employed by MI6, Gandhi's main role was to partition India in order to set it up for future conflict. His London Diary recorded this period in his life, but all but 20 pages have mysteriously disappeared. The surviving pages actually describe Gandhi's initiation to the Third Degree of Freemasonry in coded language, something only a Freemason scholar would notice.
Was Mahatma Gandhi an Illuminati Pawn?
The Dalai Lama is just another regime change tool used and funded by the Luciferian New World Order Puppet Masters to destabilize nations and destroy many sincere people who want to get closer to their higher purpose and find meaning of their existence in this world. Mr. Tenzin Gyatsu, whilst claiming to be a spiritual leader, a holy man, and a man of peace, is actually on the payroll of the C.I.A.
The DALAI LAMA is a Luciferian Disciple
Niki: “Are you saying that to God, Mother Teresa and Hitler are essentially the same?”
Jesus: “Oh no no... Hitler was horribly evil. Mother Teresa did many good things.
Jesus: What I'm saying is Mother Teresa, in her own goodness, is no closer to bridging the gap to God than Hitler is.
Jesus: Both of them based on their own merits were still a long way from being with God.
Jesus: God's standard is perfection.
originally posted by: sparrowstail
Do atheists believe in a spiritual side that can be cultivated in some way, perhaps changing the destiny or karmic potentials leading to a more prosperous life? Or do we think that there is no right or wrong or progressive evolutionary step attached to morals, values and ethics and leading a righteous life. That these concepts are only subjective applications and not universal truths.
I am truly curious about the prevalent views here on ATS regarding ego, selfishness, greed, narcissism, and selflessness
Oh come on, that's not very fair now is it? Not all spiritual people deny science, some see it as a means to understand what is outside of self, but they also understand that science can't understand what is inside of us.
What is consciousness but the immaterial "substance" that allows for scientific discovery to take place? One leads to the other, not the other way around. You can be both scientific and spiritual at the same time, there's no need for a division between the two, they're two sides of the same coin.
I would agree that science does not know or cannot define what consciousness is. Do you disagree that consciousness allows for scientific discoveries to be made? If so, why? Just because something cannot be defined or understood does not mean it doesn't exist or doesn't allow for something else to take place.
Life allows for experience to take place, but since life is not fully understood, that means it doesn't allow for experience in your opinion? That's what I'm getting from you here.
Oh, and not very many people believed that the Earth revolved around the sun a few centuries ago, that doesn't mean the idea of it was wrong.
originally posted by: templar knight
Does doing good things mean you are striving towards a higher conscience. In my humble opinion, no, you are striving towards fulfilling inate drives deep inside (like lust but not wrapped up that way). My belief is that our system of right and wrong is based n the fact that deep inside we are pack animals. We need each other and acceptance from the group to survive. We are like dogs or wolves (I was told by an animal expert that the cruelest punishment you can do to a dog is turn your back on it). So doing "good things" which usually mean doing deeds for other people is showing/getting our acceptance into the pack. Would doing the "good" things be classed as good if we were lone animals?
As for higher self, this is the logical, weigh up with mathematics the correct decision, but always being pulled by the much older emotive brain.